datacite.yml 4.6 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101
  1. # Metadata for DOI registration according to DataCite Metadata Schema 4.1.
  2. # For detailed schema description see https://doi.org/10.5438/0014
  3. ## Required fields
  4. # The main researchers involved. Include digital identifier (e.g., ORCID)
  5. # if possible, including the prefix to indicate its type.
  6. authors:
  7. -
  8. firstname: "Ryszard"
  9. lastname: "Auksztulewicz"
  10. affiliation: "Center for Cognitive Neuroscience Berlin, Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany"
  11. -
  12. firstname: "Vani"
  13. lastname: "Rajendran"
  14. affiliation: "Dept of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R."
  15. -
  16. firstname: "Fei"
  17. lastname: "Peng"
  18. affiliation: "Dept of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R."
  19. -
  20. firstname: "Jan"
  21. lastname: "Schnupp"
  22. affiliation: "Dept of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R."
  23. -
  24. firstname: "Nicol"
  25. lastname: "Harper"
  26. affiliation: "Dept of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK"
  27. # A title to describe the published resource.
  28. title: "Omission responses in local field potentials in rat auditory cortex"
  29. # Additional information about the resource, e.g., a brief abstract.
  30. description: |
  31. Non-invasive recordings of gross neural activity in humans often show responses
  32. to omitted stimuli in steady trains of identical stimuli. This has been taken
  33. as evidence for the neural coding of prediction or prediction error. However,
  34. evidence for such omission responses from invasive recordings of cellular-scale
  35. responses in animal models is scarce. Here, we sought to characterise omission
  36. responses using extracellular recordings in the auditory cortex of anaesthetised
  37. rats. We profiled omission responses across local field potentials (LFP), analogue
  38. multiunit activity (AMUA), and single/multi-unit spiking activity, using stimuli
  39. that were fixed-rate trains of acoustic noise bursts where 5% of bursts were randomly
  40. omitted. Significant omission responses were observed in LFP and AMUA signals, but
  41. not in spiking activity. These omission responses had a lower amplitude and longer
  42. latency than burst-evoked sensory responses, and omission response amplitude increased
  43. as a function of the number of preceding bursts. Together, our findings show that
  44. omission responses are most robustly observed in LFP and AMUA signals (relative to
  45. spiking activity) but do not show evidence for low-frequency phase locking. This has
  46. implications for models of cortical processing that require many neurons to encode
  47. prediction error in their spike output.
  48. # Lit of keywords the resource should be associated with.
  49. # Give as many keywords as possible, to make the resource findable.
  50. keywords:
  51. - Neuroscience
  52. - Auditory Cortex
  53. - Rat
  54. - Omission response
  55. - Predictive processing
  56. # License information for this resource. Please provide the license name and/or a link to the license.
  57. # Please add also a corresponding LICENSE file to the repository.
  58. license:
  59. name: "Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication"
  60. url: "https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/"
  61. ## Optional Fields
  62. # Funding information for this resource.
  63. # Separate funder name and grant number by comma.
  64. funding:
  65. - "European Commission; 750459"
  66. - "Hong Kong General Research Fund; 11100518"
  67. - "European Community/Hong Kong Research Grants Council Joint Research Scheme; 9051402"
  68. - "Wellcome Trust; WT09975MA"
  69. - "Wellcome Trust; WT108369/2015/Z"
  70. # Related publications. reftype might be: IsSupplementTo, IsDescribedBy, IsReferencedBy.
  71. # Please provide digital identifier (e.g., DOI) if possible.
  72. # Add a prefix to the ID, separated by a colon, to indicate the source.
  73. # Supported sources are: DOI, arXiv, PMID
  74. # In the citation field, please provide the full reference, including title, authors, journal etc.
  75. references:
  76. -
  77. id: "doi:10.1101/2022.02.11.479668"
  78. reftype: "IsSupplementTo"
  79. citation: "Omission responses in field potentials but not spikes in rat auditory cortex. Ryszard Auksztulewicz, Vani Gurusamy Rajendran, Fei Peng, Jan Wilbert Hendrik Schnupp, Nicol Spencer Harper. bioRxiv 2022.02.11.479668; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.11.479668"
  80. -
  81. id: "doi:tba"
  82. reftype: "IsSupplementTo"
  83. citation: "Omission responses in local field potentials in rat auditory cortex. Ryszard Auksztulewicz, Vani Gurusamy Rajendran, Fei Peng, Jan Wilbert Hendrik Schnupp, Nicol Spencer Harper. BMC Biology (in press)"
  84. # Resource type. Default is Dataset, other possible values are Software, DataPaper, Image, Text.
  85. resourcetype: Dataset
  86. # Do not edit or remove the following line
  87. templateversion: 1.2