No Description

Remi Gau 68bcf7d4f6 [DATALAD RUNCMD] rename files 1 year ago
.datalad ee8c38b4f6 [OpenNeuro] Dataset created 1 year ago
code 3e2ad71a87 fix 1 year ago
sub-01 68bcf7d4f6 [DATALAD RUNCMD] rename files 1 year ago
sub-02 68bcf7d4f6 [DATALAD RUNCMD] rename files 1 year ago
.gitattributes ee8c38b4f6 [OpenNeuro] Dataset created 1 year ago
CHANGES cb62e54813 [OpenNeuro] Recorded changes 1 year ago
README.md 1e0365ed15 update dataset description and remove incomplete participants.tsv 1 year ago
dataset_description.json 1e0365ed15 update dataset description and remove incomplete participants.tsv 1 year ago

README.md

Datasets with and without deliberate head movements for evaluating the performance of markerless prospective motion correction and selective reacquisition in a general clinical protocol for brain MRI

Head motion is one of the most common sources of artefacts in brain MRI. In this study, we evaluate the performance of markerless prospective motion correction (PMC) and selective reacquisition in a complete clinical protocol for brain MRI, comparing acquisitions with and without instructed intentional head motion.

MRI and head motion data were acquired between January and March 2021 from 22 healthy adults (16 females, 6 males) aged 19-36 (mean ± standard deviation: 23.5 ± 4.3) years, recruited for the Cimbi database (www.cimbi.dk). The recruitment was performed by advertisement for different research projects, with approval by the Ethics Committee of Copenhagen and Frederiksberg, Denmark (protocol number H-KF-2006-20). Written informed consent was obtained from each participant.

The MRI scan protocol consisted of six different 2D- and 3D-encoded sequences, which were completed by a different number of participants: 3D T1 MPR (n=22), 3D T2 dark fluid (FLAIR) (n=10), 2D T1 STIR (n=22), 2D T2 TSE (n=22), 2D T2* GRE (n=19) and 2D DWI (n=10). Note, currently the DWI are not shared yet, but they will be shared asap. Four scans were acquired for each sequence: two without intentional head motion (referred to as ‘still’) and two with a predefined nodding motion (‘nod’). For the T1 MPR sequence, two additional scans with shaking motion were acquired (‘shake’). The participants were instructed to perform two periods of nodding or shaking motion for 40 seconds during the middle of the acquisition, corresponding to the acquisition of the k-space center for the 3D-encoded sequences.

The scans with and without PMC were acquired in the following order:

  • Still, no correction
  • Still, PMC
  • Nod motion, no correction (+ selective reacquisition)
  • Nod motion, PMC (+ selective reacquisition)
  • Shake motion, no correction (+ selective reacquisition) - ONLY MPRAGE
  • Shake motion, PMC (+ selective reacquisition) - ONLY MPRAGE

Note that:

  • run-01 indicates the still scans,
  • run-02 indicates the nodding scans
  • run-03 indicates the shaking scans.

Nodding motion was chosen as the primary motion pattern based on results of a previous study , where nodding rotation was found to be significantly larger than the rotational components around the other axes for awake children. Rigid-body head motion was measured with the optical tracking system Tracoline (TracInnovations, Ballerup, Denmark).

More details regarding the acquisition protocol can be seen in our preprint https://psyarxiv.com/vzh4g.