Dataset to generate figures published in "The physiological basis for contrast opponency in motion computation in Drosophila"

GRamosT 9ffe8bca43 Update 'datacite.yml' 2 years ago
data da0dbb5c2c Add CC4.0 NC license to dataset 2 years ago
figures cf525940f5 Add license BSD-3 2 years ago
fullfield 348e26aabe Add BSD-3 license 2 years ago
plotting 35a32125d1 Add bsd-3 license 2 years ago
receptiveFields e835db6954 Add bsd-3 license 2 years ago
stats a2bff1673a Add bsd-3 license 2 years ago
utils f72358e517 Add license bsd3 2 years ago
LICENSE 8d455681b1 Update 'LICENSE' 2 years ago
README.md 4226558cc9 Update 'README.md' 2 years ago
datacite.yml 9ffe8bca43 Update 'datacite.yml' 2 years ago

README.md

Fly OFF motion pathway receptive fields

Dataset to generate figures published in The physiological basis for contrast opponency in motion computation in Drosophila (2021), by Giordano Ramos-Traslosheros and Marion Silies.

Includes responses from Tm1, Tm2, Tm4, Tm9, CT1 and T5 neurons with ONOFF fullfield flashes, ON bars, OFF bars. Responses were recorded with in vivo two-photon calcium imaging using GCaMP6f or jRGECO1a. Additionally Tm9 and T5 responses were also (simultaneously) recorded with a moving sinewave with different spatial and temporal frequencies. Responses are quantified as dF/F0, over manually selected regions of interest (ROIs). Tuning curves were fitted by a single Gaussian or a difference-of-Gaussians. Response quality index as a measure of trial to trial reliability. Statistical testing uses nested permutation tests.

Code

To generate figures used in the paper, first download the full repository, add it to the MATLAB path, and run the scripts in the figure folder. Final figures require additional vector illustration edits, but source data will be exported as excel files. Each figure generates a folder inside the figures folder, which contains the corresponding excel file and pdf/png figure files to be generated (e.g., figures/Fig3/someImage.pdf).

Data

Data contained in the data folder are MAT-files with the following structure

Figures 2, 4 - 7

Variables are contained in a table called ProcessedTable, with dimensions (number of recorded layers, number of data variables)

An example table entry (row) will consist of 12 data variables (columns):

  • flyInd: Index of the fly
  • stackInd: Index of the layer recorded within a fly
  • timeSeriesPath: Original path to motion corrected data, aligned to stimulus timing in local drive
  • stimParams: Set of parameters defining the stimulus used, one column per stimulus epoch, e.g., one bar position is a different epoch with all parameters unchanged except its position. Parameter examples: stimtype, lum, contrast, duration, stimrot, spacing, randomize, USEFRUSTUM (perspective correction).
  • stimParamFileName: Filename of used stimulus file
  • typeOfProblem: Zero for no problem, otherwise indicates data that could not be processed by the analysis code, potentially incomplete or aborted recording.
  • cycleInd: Each stack corresponds to a layer, while each cycle corresponds to a time series within that layer. Old Tm9 data in figure 2b, was acquired using multiple stacks to record the same layer each stack has two cycles, an empty, prestimulus cycle and a stimulus cycle. The remaining datasets were acquired using a single stack per layer, and one cycle per stimulus, with no prestimulus cycles.
  • nonParamTuning: array structure (dimensions: 1, number of channels) with tuning curves obtained via different methods (mean, variance, min, max, etc), resulting tuning curves are stored in tc variable with dimensions (number of tuning methods), each entry contains the tuning curves for that method with dimensions (1, number of ROIs, number of stimulus epochs excluding the interstimulus interval epoch). Domain indicated the stimulus parameter dimension of the tuning, in the case of bars it is the bar position measured in degrees.

    ANOVApMap_Responsive: {1×10 cell}
     ANOVApMap_Selective: {1×10 cell}
               epochMaps: {{29×1 cell}  {29×1 cell}  {29×1 cell}  {29×1 cell}  {29×1 cell}  {29×1 cell}  {29×1 cell}  {29×1 cell}  {29×1 cell}  {29×1 cell}}
                      tc: {[1×9×29 double]  [1×9×29 double]  [1×9×29 double]  [1×9×29 double]  [1×9×29 double]  [1×9×29 double]  [1×9×29 double]  [1×9×29 double]  [1×9×29 double]  [1×9×29 double]}
                tcParams: {[1×1 struct]  [1×1 struct]  [1×1 struct]  [1×1 struct]  [1×1 struct]  [1×1 struct]  [1×1 struct]  [1×1 struct]  [1×1 struct]  [1×1 struct]}
                  domain: [-28 -26 -24 -22 -20 -18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28]
          originalDomain: [-28 -26 -24 -22 -20 -18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28]
              stimSizeTC: [29 1]
            fieldNamesTC: {'stimtrans_amp'}
        stimParamsFlatTC: [1×29 struct]
          collapseMethod: 'nanmean'
           tuningMethods: {'mean'  'var'  'min'  'max'  'pctile5'  'median'  'pctile95'  'extreme'  'SNR'  'gain'}
    
  • paramTuning: struct with dimensions (channels, number of ROIs).

    • Fields:

      • fit: structure containing parameters from Gaussian fit to spatial receptive fields

        General model Gauss1:
        ans(x) =  a1*exp(-((x-b1)/c1)^2)
        Coefficients (with 95% confidence bounds):
        a1 =      0.2211  (0.175, 0.2673)
        b1 =        18.2  (17.84, 18.56)
        c1 =       2.117  (1.608, 2.627)
        
      • gof: struct with different measures of the goodness of fit

        sse: 0.4333
        rsquare: 0.5321
        dfe: 113
        adjrsquare: 0.5238
        rmse: 0.0619
        
      • info: struct with information about fitting procedure, not relevant.

  • roiMeta: array structure (dimensions: 1, number of channels) with fields backgroundRois (index of ROIs used for background subtraction, selected at last), invalidRois (indices of ROIs with NaNs in the data or some other issue).

  • responseIndex: array with dimensions (channels, number of ROIs) containing the response quality index per ROI.

  • trialsPValue: array with dimensions (channels, number of ROIs) containing the pValue testing for trial to trial differences per ROI. Not relevant for the paper analysis.

    ProcessedTable =
    
    187×12 table
    
    flyInd    stackInd                                   timeSeriesPath                                    stimParams                                stimParamFileName                               typeOfProblem    cycleInd    nonParamTuning     paramTuning       roiMeta       responseIndex    trialsPValue 
    ______    ________    ____________________________________________________________________________    _____________    ______________________________________________________________________    _____________    ________    ______________    _____________    ____________    _____________    _____________
    
     1        1           'D:\Data_LGRTL\Two_photonMat\190428.0.lr\190428.0.lr_fly1_Tm1GCaMP6f\TS-001'    [1×4  struct]    'FullField_ONOFF_1.0_2s_BG_0.5_4s_Weber_NonRand.txt'                      0                1           [        -1]      [         -1]    [1×1 struct]    [1×8  double]    [1×8  double]
     1        1           'D:\Data_LGRTL\Two_photonMat\190428.0.lr\190428.0.lr_fly1_Tm1GCaMP6f\TS-001'    [1×30 struct]    'StandingStripe_1s_YAxis_5degWide_2degSep_m1.0Con_rand_USEFRUSTUM.txt'    0                2           [1×1 struct]      [1×8  struct]    [1×1 struct]    [1×8  double]    [1×8  double]
     1        1           'D:\Data_LGRTL\Two_photonMat\190428.0.lr\190428.0.lr_fly1_Tm1GCaMP6f\TS-001'    [1×30 struct]    'StandingStripe_1s_YAxis_5degWide_2degSep_p1.0Con_rand_USEFRUSTUM.txt'    0                3           [1×1 struct]      [1×8  struct]    [1×1 struct]    [1×8  double]    [1×8  double]
     1        1           'D:\Data_LGRTL\Two_photonMat\190428.0.lr\190428.0.lr_fly1_Tm1GCaMP6f\TS-001'    [1×26 struct]    'StandingStripe_1s_XAxis_5degWide_2degSep_m1.0Con_rand_USEFRUSTUM.txt'    0                4           [1×1 struct]      [1×8  struct]    [1×1 struct]    [1×8  double]    [1×8  double]
     1        1           'D:\Data_LGRTL\Two_photonMat\190428.0.lr\190428.0.lr_fly1_Tm1GCaMP6f\TS-001'    [1×26 struct]    'StandingStripe_1s_XAxis_5degWide_2degSep_p1.0Con_rand_USEFRUSTUM.txt'    0                5           [1×1 struct]      [1×8  struct]    [1×1 struct]    [1×8  double]    [1×8  double]
     2        1           'D:\Data_LGRTL\Two_photonMat\190429.0.lr\190429.0.lr_fly1_Tm1GCaMP6f\TS-001'    [1×4  struct]    'FullField_ONOFF_1.0_2s_BG_0.5_4s_Weber_NonRand.txt'                      0                1           [        -1]      [         -1]    [1×1 struct]    [1×8  double]    [1×8  double]
     2        1           'D:\Data_LGRTL\Two_photonMat\190429.0.lr\190429.0.lr_fly1_Tm1GCaMP6f\TS-001'    [1×26 struct]    'StandingStripe_1s_XAxis_5degWide_2degSep_m1.0Con_rand_USEFRUSTUM.txt'    0                2           [1×1 struct]      [1×8  struct]    [1×1 struct]    [1×8  double]    [1×8  double]
    

Figure 3

Cell structure dataEdges, dimensions (number of flies, number of layers per fly, number of stimuli) Contains data for five stimuli ONOFF fullfield flashes, OFF horizontal bars, OFF vertical bars, ON horizontal bars, and ON vertical bars. Example of an entry:

      flyPath: '180410.0.lr_fly1_Tm9GCaMP6f-Tm4jRGECO1a'
frameDuration: 0.1111
     layerInd: 1
       roiTCs: {[1×10×112 double]  [1×10×112 double]}
 roiTCsInterp: {[1×10×124 double]  [1×10×124 double]}
stimFrameInds: {1×4 cell}
  stimulusInd: 1
 stimulusName: 'FullField_ONOFF_1.0_2s_BG_0.5_4s_Weber_NonRand.txt'
        times: [1×124 double]

Data is originally recorded with the frameDuration in seconds, but interpolated to 10 Hz, thus roiTCsInterp and times have same time dimensions because they correspond to the interpolated time series. Indices of the stimulus epoch are stored in stimFrameInds. roiTCs have dimensions of (channels, number of ROIs, number of time points).

keywords

Receptive field, contrast opponency, motion detection, direction selectivity, Drosophila vision, direction selectivity models.

License

Code

Licensed under BSD-3

Data

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA.

datacite.yml
Title The physiological basis for contrast opponency in motion computation in Drosophila
Authors Ramos-Traslosheros,Giordano;Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany. International Max Planck Research School Neuroscienes and Göttingen Graduate School for Neurosciences, Biophysics, and Molecular Biosciences (GGNB) at the University of Göttingen;ORCID:0000-0002-3798-6446
Silies,Marion;Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany.;ORCID:0000-0003-2810-9828
Description This dataset contains traces (dF/F0) from in vivo two-photon calcium imaging from Tm1, tm2, Tm4, Tm9, CT1, and T5 neurons from responses to ONOFF fullfield flashes, ON and OFF bars, and moving sinewaves.
License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0)
References Ramos-Traslosheros G., Silies, M. (2021). The physiological basis for contrast opponency in motion computation in Drosophila. Nature Communications. [] (IsSupplementTo)
Ramos-Traslosheros G., Silies, M. (2021). The physiological basis for the computation of direction selectivity in the Drosophila OFF pathway. bioRxiv 2021.04.17.440268 [] (IsSupplementTo)
Funding EU, EU.716512
Keywords Calcium imaging
Receptive field
Contrast opponency
Motion detection
Direction selectivity
Drosophila vision
Vision models
Direction selectivity models
Resource Type Dataset