#8 Gin web interface displays a remark about a repo not having a LICENSE file even though a LICENSE.txt exists

Zamknięty
otworzone 6 lat temu przez denker · 3 komentarzy
Michael Denker skomentował 6 lat temu

Licenses are sometimes in a file named LICENSE, but sometimes also LICENSE.txt or LICENSE.md or similar. Gin should use all common filenames to detect a missing license. Also, there seems no way to get rid of the message on the web interface that a license file is missing.

Licenses are sometimes in a file named `LICENSE`, but sometimes also `LICENSE.txt` or `LICENSE.md` or similar. Gin should use all common filenames to detect a missing license. Also, there seems no way to get rid of the message on the web interface that a license file is missing.
Christian Garbers skomentował 6 lat temu
Współpracownik

Hey Michael I fully agree

The warning is currently only visible to people that have write access to the repo (and not to the general public), so it should not be too bad. Its anyhow a temporary thing and will be abandoned for a less invasive licensing reminder policy very soon.

Thank you for reporting this back to us!

Hey Michael I fully agree The warning is currently only visible to people that have write access to the repo (and not to the general public), so it should not be too bad. Its anyhow a temporary thing and will be abandoned for a less invasive licensing reminder policy very soon. Thank you for reporting this back to us!
Christian Garbers skomentował 6 lat temu
Współpracownik

I think the issue should be resolved with a set of things i patched on Wednesday. Can we close it @denker?

I think the issue should be resolved with a set of things i patched on Wednesday. Can we close it @denker?
Michael Denker skomentował 6 lat temu
Autor

I can confirm it works, great! Thanks -- closing...

I can confirm it works, great! Thanks -- closing...
Zaloguj się, aby dołączyć do tej rozmowy.
Brak kamienia milowego
Brak przypisania
2 uczestników
Ładowanie...
Anuluj
Zapisz
Nie ma jeszcze treści.