#16 Publish datasets

Закриті
3 роки тому відкрито seharak · 17 коментарів
Keisuke Sehara відкоментовано 3 роки тому

Publication itself has to be done when the DOI is assigned to the article.

For each repository:

  1. Check/update usage guide.
  2. Probably better adding datacite separately (with temporary placeholders).
  3. Publish when we obtain a DOI for the article.
Publication itself has to be done when the DOI is assigned to the article. For each repository: 1. Check/update usage guide. 2. Probably better adding datacite separately (with temporary placeholders). 3. Publish when we obtain a DOI for the article.
Keisuke Sehara відкоментовано 3 роки тому
Власник

Prepared everything except for the DOI of the paper.

@jcolomb can you check if the repository is well-formatted?

Prepared everything except for the DOI of the paper. @jcolomb can you check if the [repository](https://gin.g-node.org/larkumlab/RealtimeDLC_DataRepository) is well-formatted?
julien colomb відкоментовано 3 роки тому
Власник

Please update the main readme file:

  • link do not work
  • add link to paper
  • add details about what is to be found, how one could reuse it (if not in the paper),

You may want to erase all unnecessary readme files coming from the template, i.e. get rid of empty folders.

what about https://github.com/gwappa/python-ksdlc

you have datasets in the code folder (https://gin.g-node.org/larkumlab/Keisuke_Sehara_RTDLC/src/master/30_code/whisker_model_A22-Keisuke-2019-09-09/training-datasets/iteration-1/UnaugmentedDataSet_whisker_model_A22Sep9/CollectedData_Keisuke.csv) why?

better title would be dataset and code for TITLEOFPAPER

Please update the main readme file: - link do not work - add link to paper - add details about what is to be found, how one could reuse it (if not in the paper), You may want to erase all unnecessary readme files coming from the template, i.e. get rid of empty folders. what about https://github.com/gwappa/python-ksdlc you have datasets in the code folder (https://gin.g-node.org/larkumlab/Keisuke_Sehara_RTDLC/src/master/30_code/whisker_model_A22-Keisuke-2019-09-09/training-datasets/iteration-1/UnaugmentedDataSet_whisker_model_A22Sep9/CollectedData_Keisuke.csv) why? better title would be dataset and code for TITLEOFPAPER
julien colomb відкоментовано 3 роки тому
Власник

you need to check with the publisher if you are legally allowed to publish the rebuttal letters

you need to check with the publisher if you are legally allowed to publish the rebuttal letters
julien colomb відкоментовано 3 роки тому
Власник

You may want to add some info about relation between figures, code and data, the main readme could be a place for that ?

but a spreadsheet may be better

You may want to add some info about relation between figures, code and data, the main readme could be a place for that ? but a spreadsheet may be better
Keisuke Sehara відкоментовано 3 роки тому
Власник

Actually the repository to be published is here:

https://gin.g-node.org/larkumlab/RealtimeDLC_DataRepository

  • Manuscript / rebuttal are not included.
  • Currently we do not have a link to the paper. We are still waiting for it...
Actually the repository to be published is here: https://gin.g-node.org/larkumlab/RealtimeDLC_DataRepository - Manuscript / rebuttal are not included. - Currently we do not have a link to the paper. We are still waiting for it...
Keisuke Sehara відкоментовано 3 роки тому
Власник

I will reorganize this repository, too.

I will reorganize this repository, too.
julien colomb відкоментовано 3 роки тому
Власник

ok, need to look what happens to submodules when pushing register doi.

I am afraid the submodules will not be included in the snapshot. @msonntag , @achilleas ?

ok, need to look what happens to submodules when pushing register doi. I am afraid the submodules will not be included in the snapshot. @msonntag , @achilleas ?
Achilleas Koutsou відкоментовано 3 роки тому

You're right. Submodules aren't included in the snapshot (archive) nor the fork when registering a DOI. In fact we recently discovered that submodules cause issues with our registration process.

You're right. Submodules aren't included in the snapshot (archive) nor the fork when registering a DOI. In fact we recently discovered that submodules cause issues with our registration process.
Keisuke Sehara відкоментовано 3 роки тому
Власник

Then do I need to ask for DOIs of all the submodules separately?

Then do I need to ask for DOIs of all the submodules separately?
Achilleas Koutsou відкоментовано 3 роки тому

I guess that's up to you. If you want to create a single archive and publication, maybe combining them is better. Perhaps @msonntag has a different suggestion?

I guess that's up to you. If you want to create a single archive and publication, maybe combining them is better. Perhaps @msonntag has a different suggestion?
Achilleas Koutsou відкоментовано 3 роки тому

I guess that's up to you. If you want to create a single archive and publication, maybe combining them is better. Perhaps @msonntag has a different suggestion?

I guess that's up to you. If you want to create a single archive and publication, maybe combining them is better. Perhaps @msonntag has a different suggestion?
Keisuke Sehara відкоментовано 3 роки тому
Власник

OK, now I am getting confused.

If I request a DOI only for the root data repository, you guys say the submodules will not get archived together. Does that mean, technically, the submodules will not be associated with the DOI?

And when you @achilleas say "combining them", do you mean to remove the submodules and load the original data back for the root repository to manage them directly?

OK, now I am getting confused. If I request a DOI only for the root data repository, you guys say the submodules will not get archived together. Does that mean, technically, the submodules will not be associated with the DOI? And when you @achilleas say "combining them", do you mean to remove the submodules and load the original data back for the root repository to manage them directly?
Achilleas Koutsou відкоментовано 3 роки тому

Sorry for the confusion.

If I request a DOI only for the root data repository, you guys say the submodules will not get archived together.

The DOI archive will include everything in the root data repository. In other words, everything you get when you git clone the repository + annexed data.

Does that mean, technically, the submodules will not be associated with the DOI?

Technically, no, the submodules wont be part of the DOI. However, the archive will include the .gitmodules file, which includes URLs to the submodules. Which also means that the fork of the repository will point to the original locations of the submodules.

Whether this is desirable or not is up to you.

I should note that if you plan to publish a repository with submodules, you should talk to us first, since it might cause issues with the cloning process on the server.

And when you @achilleas say "combining them", do you mean to remove the submodules and load the original data back for the root repository to manage them directly?

Yes, it was just a suggestion though. I don't know if this works for you. I mean you could just create a new "publication-ready" repository that includes everything and publish that and keep it separate from your working copy with the submodules.

Sorry for the confusion. > If I request a DOI only for the root data repository, you guys say the submodules will not get archived together. The DOI archive will include everything in the root data repository. In other words, everything you get when you `git clone` the repository + annexed data. > Does that mean, technically, the submodules will not be associated with the DOI? Technically, no, the submodules wont be part of the DOI. However, the archive will include the `.gitmodules` file, which includes URLs to the submodules. Which also means that the fork of the repository will point to the **original locations of the submodules**. Whether this is desirable or not is up to you. I should note that if you plan to publish a repository with submodules, you should talk to us first, since it might cause issues with the cloning process on the server. > And when you @achilleas say "combining them", do you mean to remove the submodules and load the original data back for the root repository to manage them directly? Yes, it was just a suggestion though. I don't know if this works for you. I mean you could just create a new "publication-ready" repository that includes everything and publish that and keep it separate from your working copy with the submodules.
julien colomb відкоментовано 3 роки тому
Власник

A future job for Tonic ;)

A future job for Tonic ;)
Keisuke Sehara відкоментовано 3 роки тому
Власник

Thanks @achilleas and @jcolomb!

Then I will combine all the data into the root data repository.

Thanks @achilleas and @jcolomb! Then I will combine all the data into the root data repository.
Keisuke Sehara відкоментовано 3 роки тому
Власник

Now the data repository is stand-alone. https://gin.g-node.org/larkumlab/RealtimeDLC_DataRepository

I am still waiting for the DOI of the paper...

Now the data repository is stand-alone. https://gin.g-node.org/larkumlab/RealtimeDLC_DataRepository I am still waiting for the DOI of the paper...
Keisuke Sehara відкоментовано 3 роки тому
Власник

Did it

Did it
Підпишіться щоб приєднатися до обговорення.
Етап відсутній
Немає відповідального
3 учасників
Завантажується...
Скасувати
Зберегти
Тут ще немає жодного вмісту.