Scheduled service maintenance on November 22


On Friday, November 22, 2024, between 06:00 CET and 18:00 CET, GIN services will undergo planned maintenance. Extended service interruptions should be expected. We will try to keep downtimes to a minimum, but recommend that users avoid critical tasks, large data uploads, or DOI requests during this time.

We apologize for any inconvenience.

science_communication 2.9 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253
  1. # Notes
  2. ## instagram instead of google image
  3. - very small thumbnail
  4. - text about 125 characters, 5-10 hashtags
  5. ## fromthelabbench (advice from open science mooc.)
  6. ### instagram
  7. http://www.fromthelabbench.com/?offset=1541656610425
  8. - instagram for science:#scicomm
  9. - self-expression motivations dominate.
  10. - Motivation (scholarship, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1345026.v2):
  11. - contribute to scientific discussion
  12. - get feedback
  13. - share/promote research
  14. - test-bed for ides
  15. - excuse to explore papers outside of own area
  16. - keep in touch
  17. - bring together different areas of science
  18. - *brung things to light people don't normaloly talk about*
  19. - *communicate through fun cool content*
  20. http://www.fromthelabbench.com/from-the-lab-bench-science-blog/2016/7/19/the-art-of-knowing-when-you-are-in-over-your-head-with-science-communication
  21. ### Communication tool
  22. Perhaps most importantly, scientists need to be good writers. This includes the ability to build a narrative or story around scientific research, the IMRAD story structure (introduction, methods, results and discussion) being no exception. Being able to tell a story, which involves being able to boil a scientific project down to its key problem(s) and solution(s), also helps scientists become better presenters and speakers. And all scientists should have a working knowledge of effective presentation slide design and visual communication basic principles.
  23. I would argue that the minute a scientist or researcher considers communicating with a broader audience, or an audience outside of their scientific peers, they should consider collaborating with professional creatives. Because when it comes to communicating with non-scientists, most scientists are in over their heads.
  24. - the abt method: http://www.laseagrant.org/wp-content/uploads/LaDIA-Katrina-blog-AC.pdf: exposition (AND), problem (BUT), solution (therefore).
  25. - story telling: implicate human, personal change in the story
  26. ### random ideas
  27. -find out what people already know about that issue
  28. - Don’t just rely on self-selection – go seek out and recruit your desired audience.
  29. - it is about getting the echo chamber stronger, not reaching out of it.
  30. - Avoid jargon. Don’t write a textbook – the people you are trying to reach probably ran away from science textbooks in school. Tell stories.
  31. - Write headlines so good they get clicks, and lead paragraphs so entrancing they turn clicks into at least half-reads.
  32. - Appeal to your target audience’s interests, values and curiosity.
  33. -Speak in their language. Focus on the impacts of science, not the boring details.
  34. - Don’t underestimate people’s intelligence or overestimate their familiarity with technical terms. Hook people with beautiful images and gut-grabbing visual representations of the data.
  35. - Merge science with sci-fi, art, film and popular culture
  36. - "focus on what makes you unique" as an advice for people who would like to reach the the rest of the sfb.