|
|
@@ -1,3 +1,39 @@
|
|
|
+# Meeting outputs
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### main decisions
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- force19, ok
|
|
|
+- continue discussion with other SFB, info dissemination project is our to lead
|
|
|
+- Get a meeting with Thomas. We do not care who develop it but we need something going to start testing.
|
|
|
+- Continue to work on mice metadata (some files will be sent by matthew soonish)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## strategy
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Main objective is information dissemination, the development of the tool should keep this in mind.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- Get MVP with commenting
|
|
|
+- Analyse comment to find gaps
|
|
|
+- modify tool to push people to fill the gaps (empty box, badges,...)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## software
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- need simplified workflow, only one tab ?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## visualisation
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- need search filter function
|
|
|
+- interaction with author should be straightforward
|
|
|
+- maybe need to link to something they already know, as a reminder of what we are talking about.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## My role
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- ASAP stop developing, but foster tool use
|
|
|
+- social component
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
#Vorbereitung
|
|
|
|
|
|
## 1. Collaborations
|
|
|
@@ -34,15 +70,21 @@ Visualisation and data upload in a 2 tab browsable software
|
|
|
- metadata: minimal standards:
|
|
|
- animal (species, genotype, date_of_birth, light modus, diet) - similar to/extended from pyrat ?
|
|
|
- experiment (date, time, temperature, light modus)
|
|
|
-- https://www.nwb.org/ standard for data (python, matlab export)
|
|
|
+- https://www.nwb.org/ standard for data (python, matlab export, called hdf5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## 5. RDM work
|
|
|
|
|
|
- talk with Robert, work with keisuke:
|
|
|
- data of paper to be organised, pushed to GIN
|
|
|
+ - structure worked, file naming comes next.
|
|
|
- time to perform the work will be reported : paper to follow when 3-4 case studies are there.
|
|
|
- next steps will be to share the analysis code.
|
|
|
- next will talk with christian for imaging data, using same approach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+## 6. survey and server
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- 14 labs responded
|
|
|
+- estimation gots from 5 to 200 TB (whole lab data)
|
|
|
+- need to talk to itb people about it.
|
