In most cases, the users seem to want to upload files on the server via their setup computer, and then erase them from that setup computer, I would therefore propose to add the gin remove-content in the scripts ?
Ps are we still using this repo or should I move the issues to the tonic github repo ?
In most cases, the users seem to want to upload files on the server via their setup computer, and then erase them from that setup computer, I would therefore propose to add the gin remove-content in the scripts ?
Ps are we still using this repo or should I move the issues to the tonic github repo ?
In most cases, the users seem to want to upload files on the server via their setup computer, and then erase them from that setup computer, I would therefore propose to add the gin remove-content in the scripts ?
That's a good idea. I imagine there are cases where you want an "upload" machine that generates or collects data, pushes it to the server, and then clears the local storage.
Ps are we still using this repo or should I move the issues to the tonic github repo ?
No, I think here is better for coordinating the project in general separately from the framework.
> In most cases, the users seem to want to upload files on the server via their setup computer, and then erase them from that setup computer, I would therefore propose to add the gin remove-content in the scripts ?
That's a good idea. I imagine there are cases where you want an "upload" machine that generates or collects data, pushes it to the server, and then clears the local storage.
> Ps are we still using this repo or should I move the issues to the tonic github repo ?
No, I think here is better for coordinating the project in general separately from the framework.
added in #14, but we may change it to something easier for the user to change for the next version that will work with submodule :
if nobigfiles then gin remove-content
else gin download-content
added in #14, but we may change it to something easier for the user to change for the next version that will work with submodule :
```
if nobigfiles then gin remove-content
else gin download-content
```
maybe we can consider having a config file for all the options, or a location at the top of the file where users can edit the conditions in one place.
The config file option would allow to have different options for different submodules, if this would be relevant (maybe you do not want the raw data, but still want the powerpoint presentations ?).
Not completely related: I am also worried about people downloading content manually, and getting the content removed when using the script.
from achilleas:
> maybe we can consider having a config file for all the options, or a location at the top of the file where users can edit the conditions in one place.
The config file option would allow to have different options for different submodules, if this would be relevant (maybe you do not want the raw data, but still want the powerpoint presentations ?).
Not completely related: I am also worried about people downloading content manually, and getting the content removed when using the script.
Achilleas Koutsou
In most cases, the users seem to want to upload files on the server via their setup computer, and then erase them from that setup computer, I would therefore propose to add the gin remove-content in the scripts ?
Ps are we still using this repo or should I move the issues to the tonic github repo ?
That's a good idea. I imagine there are cases where you want an "upload" machine that generates or collects data, pushes it to the server, and then clears the local storage.
No, I think here is better for coordinating the project in general separately from the framework.
added in #14, but we may change it to something easier for the user to change for the next version that will work with submodule :
from achilleas:
The config file option would allow to have different options for different submodules, if this would be relevant (maybe you do not want the raw data, but still want the powerpoint presentations ?).
Not completely related: I am also worried about people downloading content manually, and getting the content removed when using the script.
Added function, need to consider a possiblity to remove content from some submodule and not others, see #19.