#90 supported git-annex version & alternative hosting services

開啟中
sprenger1 年之前創建 · 3 條評論
sprenger commented 1 年之前

Currently this repository requires an old version of git-annex<10.

In the future this repo might be moved to a different hosting service to permit the usage of the latest git-annex (and datalad) version for file content retrieval.

Alternative options are

These approaches would make accessing the data more complicated, as two services are involved, that both might require authentication to retrieve the data, e.g see datalad-osf example

Currently this repository requires an old version of git-annex<10. In the future this repo might be moved to a different hosting service to permit the usage of the latest git-annex (and datalad) version for file content retrieval. Alternative options are - github + OSF (see [datalad-osf](http://docs.datalad.org/projects/osf/en/stable/index.html)) - github + another special remote (see [datalad list of special remotes](https://git-annex.branchable.com/special_remotes/)) - different proposals? These approaches would make accessing the data more complicated, as two services are involved, that both might require authentication to retrieve the data, e.g see [datalad-osf example](http://docs.datalad.org/projects/osf/en/stable/tutorial/authentication.html)
Benjamin K Dichter commented 1 年之前
協同者

Is there a pressing need for this? Are there features of newer git-annex we want to leverage or is a component of our pipeline dropping support for older versions?

Is there a pressing need for this? Are there features of newer git-annex we want to leverage or is a component of our pipeline dropping support for older versions?
sprenger commented 1 年之前
所有者

It's not pressing for any of the projects I am aware of. However, there might be other projects around using this repository here that might have different requirements. This would be the time to speak up :)

It's not pressing for any of the projects I am aware of. However, there might be other projects around using this repository here that might have different requirements. This would be the time to speak up :)
Samuel Garcia commented 1 年之前
所有者

Hi Julia, thanks for this discussion. For the choice is mainly be : how long the service will maintain. OSF solution sound appealing on long term, no ?

Lets make a call around no ?

Hi Julia, thanks for this discussion. For the choice is mainly be : how long the service will maintain. OSF solution sound appealing on long term, no ? Lets make a call around no ?
Sign in to join this conversation.
未選擇標籤
未選擇里程碑
未指派成員
3 參與者
正在加載...
取消
保存
尚未有任何內容