caption correction for Fig. 7

main.pdf

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-/annex/objects/MD5E-s470571--7733880a59ee7c73bf1c502e98a31fff.pdf

main.pdf

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+.git/annex/objects/Wx/88/MD5E-s470559--c32fb7ae277353511d2aa963edd2b002.pdf/MD5E-s470559--c32fb7ae277353511d2aa963edd2b002.pdf

main.tex

@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ It should be noted that these measures are most useful in the absence of ground
 \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{Fig7.pdf}
 
 \caption{\label{fig:confusion}\textbf{Example of diarization performance evaluation using confusion matrices}
-VTC annotations of the public VanDam corpus \citep{vandam-day} are compared to a gold standard manually annotated using ELAN (eaf). The first coefficient of the left side matrix should be read as: ``43\% of CHI segments from the VTC were also labelled as CHI by the human annotator'' (i.e. as the precision of the algorithm). The first coefficient of the right side matrix should be read as: ``95\% of the portions labelled as CHI speech by the annotator were also labelled as CHI by the VTC'' (i.e. as the recall of the algorithm). The sum of each row of the right-hand plot may exceed one due to overlapping speech. However, the diagonal should ideally be only ones.
+VTC annotations of the public VanDam corpus \citep{vandam-day} are compared to a gold standard manually annotated using ELAN (eaf). The first coefficient of the left side matrix should be read as: ``43\% of CHI segments from the VTC were also labelled as CHI by the human annotator'' (i.e. as the precision of the algorithm). The first coefficient of the right side matrix should be read as: ``95\% of the portions labelled as CHI speech by the annotator were also labelled as CHI by the VTC'' (i.e. as the recall of the algorithm). The sum of each row may exceed one due to overlapping speech. However, the diagonal should ideally be only ones.
 }
 
 \end{figure*}