#6 Check availability of git-annex content

已关闭
sprenger3 年之前创建 · 7 条评论
sprenger 评论于 3 年之前

It seems the content of some files is not available any more since 534ceaaec4

Using earlier commits should still allow to access the content.

It seems the content of some files is not available any more since https://gin.g-node.org/INT/multielectrode_grasp/commit/534ceaaec49784f182cec22111ca29cd70cead25 Using earlier commits should still allow to access the content.
Michael Denker 评论于 3 年之前
所有者

So, you mean, the actual data (nev, nsx, etc) files are not available via git-annex or gin? I just tried using web-download, there I couldn't find files that don't download...

So, you mean, the actual data (nev, nsx, etc) files are not available via `git-annex` or `gin`? I just tried using web-download, there I couldn't find files that don't download...
sprenger 评论于 3 年之前
协作者

@stellalessandra pointed out that she experienced issues when using gin get and gin get-content.

@stellalessandra pointed out that she experienced issues when using `gin get` and `gin get-content`.
Michael Denker 评论于 3 年之前
所有者

Indeed, getting the latest lilou files leads to wrong files being downloaded by the client. From the web interface downloading the same file works as a workaround.

Indeed, getting the latest lilou files leads to wrong files being downloaded by the client. From the web interface downloading the same file works as a workaround.
Michael Denker 评论于 3 年之前
所有者

Indeed, the previous commit still works for me. Any idea what the latest commit 534c actually did? I assume there was not change to the data itself... Maybe the best would be do revert to :3266 and make a new commit.

Indeed, the previous commit still works for me. Any idea what the latest commit `534c` actually did? I assume there was not change to the data itself... Maybe the best would be do revert to `:3266` and make a new commit.
sprenger 评论于 3 年之前
协作者

I reverted the last commit and it seems to work again. My feeling is that 534c was not intended for this remote / branch, but a side effect of working on #5. Sorry for that.

I reverted the last commit and it seems to work again. My feeling is that `534c` was not intended for this remote / branch, but a side effect of working on #5. Sorry for that.
sprenger 评论于 3 年之前
协作者

@stellalessandra, can you confirm it is working for you again?

@stellalessandra, can you confirm it is working for you again?
Michael Denker 评论于 3 年之前
所有者

I can confirm it works again for me -- thanks for the reversion!

I can confirm it works again for me -- thanks for the reversion!
登录 并参与到对话中。
未选择里程碑
未指派成员
2 名参与者
正在加载...
取消
保存
这个人很懒,什么都没留下。