rd_CC_MOp-MOp_dilated_cut_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: rd_CC_MOp-MOp_dilated_cut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ====================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0035
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 116002.512 0.000 1.000 -227360.745 227360.745
  14. merged_timepoint 0.001 0.000 2.369 0.018 0.000 0.001
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ====================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0159 0.8314 -0.0231 0.0548 False
  23. 0 7 -0.0186 0.758 -0.0597 0.0225 False
  24. 0 14 0.0239 0.5323 -0.0167 0.0644 False
  25. 0 21 0.0379 0.082 -0.0026 0.0784 False
  26. 0 28 0.0314 0.2661 -0.0106 0.0735 False
  27. 3 7 -0.0344 0.0986 -0.0723 0.0035 False
  28. 3 14 0.008 0.9 -0.0293 0.0453 False
  29. 3 21 0.022 0.5282 -0.0153 0.0593 False
  30. 3 28 0.0156 0.8434 -0.0234 0.0545 False
  31. 7 14 0.0424 0.0275 0.0029 0.082 True
  32. 7 21 0.0565 0.001 0.0169 0.096 True
  33. 7 28 0.05 0.0075 0.0089 0.0911 True
  34. 14 21 0.014 0.9 -0.0249 0.053 False
  35. 14 28 0.0076 0.9 -0.033 0.0481 False
  36. 21 28 -0.0065 0.9 -0.047 0.0341 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ==================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. --------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0171 0.9 -0.0334 0.0676 False
  44. 0 7 0.0129 0.9 -0.0337 0.0596 False
  45. 0 14 0.014 0.9 -0.0308 0.0588 False
  46. 0 21 0.0019 0.9 -0.0494 0.0531 False
  47. 0 28 0.0071 0.9 -0.0415 0.0558 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0041 0.9 -0.0554 0.0471 False
  49. 3 14 -0.0031 0.9 -0.0526 0.0465 False
  50. 3 21 -0.0152 0.9 -0.0707 0.0403 False
  51. 3 28 -0.0099 0.9 -0.063 0.0431 False
  52. 7 14 0.0011 0.9 -0.0445 0.0467 False
  53. 7 21 -0.0111 0.9 -0.063 0.0409 False
  54. 7 28 -0.0058 0.9 -0.0552 0.0436 False
  55. 14 21 -0.0121 0.9 -0.0624 0.0382 False
  56. 14 28 -0.0069 0.9 -0.0545 0.0408 False
  57. 21 28 0.0053 0.9 -0.0485 0.059 False
  58. --------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.89152283] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.36674404] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.10063133] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.04934638] Yes
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.02617508] Yes
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.80388672] No