rd_CC_MOp-MOp_cut_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: rd_CC_MOp-MOp_cut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ====================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0040
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 124111.786 0.000 1.000 -243254.630 243254.630
  14. merged_timepoint 0.001 0.000 3.344 0.001 0.000 0.002
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ====================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 -0.0107 0.9 -0.0529 0.0314 False
  23. 0 7 -0.0137 0.9 -0.0582 0.0308 False
  24. 0 14 0.0277 0.4574 -0.0161 0.0716 False
  25. 0 21 0.0356 0.1846 -0.0083 0.0795 False
  26. 0 28 0.0398 0.125 -0.0058 0.0853 False
  27. 3 7 -0.003 0.9 -0.044 0.0381 False
  28. 3 14 0.0385 0.0714 -0.0019 0.0789 False
  29. 3 21 0.0464 0.0141 0.006 0.0867 True
  30. 3 28 0.0505 0.0089 0.0084 0.0927 True
  31. 7 14 0.0415 0.0637 -0.0013 0.0843 False
  32. 7 21 0.0493 0.0136 0.0065 0.0921 True
  33. 7 28 0.0535 0.0086 0.009 0.098 True
  34. 14 21 0.0079 0.9 -0.0343 0.05 False
  35. 14 28 0.012 0.9 -0.0319 0.0559 False
  36. 21 28 0.0041 0.9 -0.0397 0.048 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ==================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. --------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.018 0.9 -0.0356 0.0716 False
  44. 0 7 0.0135 0.9 -0.036 0.063 False
  45. 0 14 0.0173 0.9 -0.0302 0.0648 False
  46. 0 21 0.0052 0.9 -0.0492 0.0596 False
  47. 0 28 0.0068 0.9 -0.0448 0.0584 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0045 0.9 -0.0589 0.0499 False
  49. 3 14 -0.0008 0.9 -0.0533 0.0518 False
  50. 3 21 -0.0129 0.9 -0.0717 0.046 False
  51. 3 28 -0.0112 0.9 -0.0675 0.0451 False
  52. 7 14 0.0038 0.9 -0.0446 0.0522 False
  53. 7 21 -0.0083 0.9 -0.0635 0.0468 False
  54. 7 28 -0.0067 0.9 -0.0591 0.0457 False
  55. 14 21 -0.0121 0.9 -0.0655 0.0413 False
  56. 14 28 -0.0105 0.9 -0.061 0.0401 False
  57. 21 28 0.0016 0.9 -0.0554 0.0587 False
  58. --------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.04077441] Yes
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.70778361] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.26919943] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.07449597] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.0124491] Yes
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.76736685] No