md_OT_och-lgn_lgncut_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: md_OT_och-lgn_lgncut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ====================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0052
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 141310.376 0.000 1.000 -276963.248 276963.248
  14. merged_timepoint 0.001 0.000 2.133 0.033 0.000 0.002
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ====================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 -0.038 0.1272 -0.0816 0.0056 False
  23. 0 7 -0.0277 0.5108 -0.0737 0.0183 False
  24. 0 14 0.003 0.9 -0.0424 0.0484 False
  25. 0 21 0.0059 0.9 -0.0394 0.0513 False
  26. 0 28 0.0105 0.9 -0.0366 0.0576 False
  27. 3 7 0.0103 0.9 -0.0322 0.0527 False
  28. 3 14 0.0409 0.0581 -0.0008 0.0827 False
  29. 3 21 0.0439 0.0329 0.0022 0.0857 True
  30. 3 28 0.0485 0.0197 0.0049 0.0921 True
  31. 7 14 0.0307 0.35 -0.0136 0.0749 False
  32. 7 21 0.0336 0.2486 -0.0106 0.0779 False
  33. 7 28 0.0382 0.1655 -0.0078 0.0842 False
  34. 14 21 0.003 0.9 -0.0406 0.0466 False
  35. 14 28 0.0075 0.9 -0.0379 0.0529 False
  36. 21 28 0.0046 0.9 -0.0408 0.05 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0254 0.878 -0.042 0.0928 False
  44. 0 7 0.0101 0.9 -0.0521 0.0723 False
  45. 0 14 0.0273 0.7484 -0.0325 0.087 False
  46. 0 21 0.0218 0.9 -0.0466 0.0902 False
  47. 0 28 0.006 0.9 -0.0589 0.0708 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0153 0.9 -0.0837 0.053 False
  49. 3 14 0.0018 0.9 -0.0643 0.0679 False
  50. 3 21 -0.0036 0.9 -0.0776 0.0704 False
  51. 3 28 -0.0195 0.9 -0.0903 0.0513 False
  52. 7 14 0.0172 0.9 -0.0437 0.078 False
  53. 7 21 0.0117 0.9 -0.0576 0.0811 False
  54. 7 28 -0.0041 0.9 -0.07 0.0617 False
  55. 14 21 -0.0054 0.9 -0.0726 0.0617 False
  56. 14 28 -0.0213 0.9 -0.0848 0.0422 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0158 0.9 -0.0876 0.0559 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.04062227] Yes
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.78475587] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.90088949] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.29591172] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.10042619] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.11398907] No