md_CC_MOs-MOs_cut_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: md_CC_MOs-MOs_cut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ====================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0064
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 156699.713 0.000 1.000 -307125.795 307125.795
  14. merged_timepoint 0.001 0.000 2.101 0.036 0.000 0.002
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ====================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 -0.0008 0.9 -0.0545 0.053 False
  23. 0 7 -0.0099 0.9 -0.0667 0.0468 False
  24. 0 14 0.0349 0.4727 -0.0211 0.0908 False
  25. 0 21 0.0321 0.5567 -0.0238 0.088 False
  26. 0 28 0.035 0.5093 -0.0231 0.093 False
  27. 3 7 -0.0091 0.9 -0.0614 0.0432 False
  28. 3 14 0.0357 0.3491 -0.0158 0.0871 False
  29. 3 21 0.0329 0.4448 -0.0186 0.0844 False
  30. 3 28 0.0358 0.3975 -0.018 0.0895 False
  31. 7 14 0.0448 0.1743 -0.0097 0.0994 False
  32. 7 21 0.042 0.2346 -0.0125 0.0966 False
  33. 7 28 0.0449 0.2078 -0.0118 0.1016 False
  34. 14 21 -0.0028 0.9 -0.0565 0.051 False
  35. 14 28 0.0001 0.9 -0.0559 0.056 False
  36. 21 28 0.0029 0.9 -0.0531 0.0588 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.049 0.296 -0.0185 0.1165 False
  44. 0 7 0.0146 0.9 -0.0478 0.077 False
  45. 0 14 0.017 0.9 -0.0429 0.0768 False
  46. 0 21 0.0254 0.8895 -0.0431 0.0939 False
  47. 0 28 0.0096 0.9 -0.0554 0.0746 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0344 0.6723 -0.1029 0.0341 False
  49. 3 14 -0.032 0.703 -0.0983 0.0342 False
  50. 3 21 -0.0236 0.9 -0.0978 0.0506 False
  51. 3 28 -0.0394 0.5846 -0.1103 0.0315 False
  52. 7 14 0.0024 0.9 -0.0586 0.0634 False
  53. 7 21 0.0108 0.9 -0.0587 0.0803 False
  54. 7 28 -0.005 0.9 -0.071 0.0611 False
  55. 14 21 0.0084 0.9 -0.0588 0.0757 False
  56. 14 28 -0.0073 0.9 -0.071 0.0563 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0158 0.9 -0.0877 0.0561 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.00467299] Yes
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.74222301] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.92297078] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.36442848] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.01277025] Yes
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.55677453] No