md_CC_MOp-MOp_cut_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: md_CC_MOp-MOp_cut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ====================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0053
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 142811.254 0.000 1.000 -279904.914 279904.914
  14. merged_timepoint 0.001 0.000 3.100 0.002 0.000 0.002
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ====================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 -0.0076 0.9 -0.0555 0.0403 False
  23. 0 7 -0.0202 0.8424 -0.0708 0.0303 False
  24. 0 14 0.0265 0.6248 -0.0233 0.0764 False
  25. 0 21 0.0348 0.3419 -0.0151 0.0846 False
  26. 0 28 0.0409 0.2098 -0.0109 0.0926 False
  27. 3 7 -0.0126 0.9 -0.0592 0.034 False
  28. 3 14 0.0341 0.2693 -0.0117 0.08 False
  29. 3 21 0.0424 0.0878 -0.0035 0.0882 False
  30. 3 28 0.0485 0.0453 0.0006 0.0963 True
  31. 7 14 0.0468 0.0669 -0.0018 0.0954 False
  32. 7 21 0.055 0.0165 0.0064 0.1036 True
  33. 7 28 0.0611 0.008 0.0106 0.1116 True
  34. 14 21 0.0082 0.9 -0.0396 0.0561 False
  35. 14 28 0.0143 0.9 -0.0355 0.0642 False
  36. 21 28 0.0061 0.9 -0.0437 0.0559 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0307 0.6981 -0.0324 0.0937 False
  44. 0 7 0.0175 0.9 -0.0407 0.0758 False
  45. 0 14 0.0243 0.7824 -0.0316 0.0803 False
  46. 0 21 0.0184 0.9 -0.0455 0.0824 False
  47. 0 28 0.0127 0.9 -0.048 0.0734 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0132 0.9 -0.0772 0.0508 False
  49. 3 14 -0.0063 0.9 -0.0682 0.0555 False
  50. 3 21 -0.0122 0.9 -0.0815 0.057 False
  51. 3 28 -0.0179 0.9 -0.0842 0.0483 False
  52. 7 14 0.0068 0.9 -0.0501 0.0638 False
  53. 7 21 0.0009 0.9 -0.064 0.0658 False
  54. 7 28 -0.0048 0.9 -0.0664 0.0569 False
  55. 14 21 -0.0059 0.9 -0.0687 0.0569 False
  56. 14 28 -0.0116 0.9 -0.0711 0.0479 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0057 0.9 -0.0728 0.0614 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.03090795] Yes
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.99807817] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.62712935] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.10681444] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.00280311] Yes
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.87641959] No