fa_TC_DORsm-SSp_ll+SSp_ul_ipsilesional_END+higherstepsize__log.txt 3.3 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: fa_TC_DORsm-SSp_ll+SSp_ul_ipsilesional_END+higherstepsize_
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ===========================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0013
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: 676.8823
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -----------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -----------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.363 0.003 121.052 0.000 0.357 0.369
  14. merged_timepoint 0.001 0.000 4.217 0.000 0.000 0.001
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ===========================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0187 0.3221 -0.0077 0.0451 False
  23. 0 7 0.0067 0.9 -0.0211 0.0346 False
  24. 0 14 0.0189 0.3599 -0.0086 0.0464 False
  25. 0 21 0.0221 0.1947 -0.0054 0.0495 False
  26. 0 28 0.0298 0.0344 0.0013 0.0584 True
  27. 3 7 -0.012 0.7311 -0.0377 0.0137 False
  28. 3 14 0.0001 0.9 -0.0251 0.0254 False
  29. 3 21 0.0033 0.9 -0.022 0.0286 False
  30. 3 28 0.0111 0.8096 -0.0153 0.0375 False
  31. 7 14 0.0122 0.7544 -0.0146 0.039 False
  32. 7 21 0.0153 0.5585 -0.0115 0.0421 False
  33. 7 28 0.0231 0.1655 -0.0047 0.051 False
  34. 14 21 0.0032 0.9 -0.0232 0.0296 False
  35. 14 28 0.011 0.8452 -0.0165 0.0384 False
  36. 21 28 0.0078 0.9 -0.0197 0.0353 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0064 0.9 -0.0205 0.0332 False
  44. 0 7 0.0079 0.9 -0.0169 0.0327 False
  45. 0 14 0.0217 0.095 -0.0021 0.0455 False
  46. 0 21 0.0244 0.1083 -0.0029 0.0516 False
  47. 0 28 0.0221 0.1401 -0.0037 0.0479 False
  48. 3 7 0.0015 0.9 -0.0257 0.0288 False
  49. 3 14 0.0154 0.5371 -0.011 0.0417 False
  50. 3 21 0.018 0.4924 -0.0115 0.0475 False
  51. 3 28 0.0157 0.5794 -0.0125 0.0439 False
  52. 7 14 0.0139 0.5573 -0.0104 0.0381 False
  53. 7 21 0.0165 0.516 -0.0111 0.0441 False
  54. 7 28 0.0142 0.6068 -0.012 0.0405 False
  55. 14 21 0.0026 0.9 -0.0241 0.0294 False
  56. 14 28 0.0004 0.9 -0.025 0.0257 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0023 0.9 -0.0308 0.0263 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.38418309] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.58575711] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.63597541] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.5608486] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.66035682] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.80351802] No