fa_TC_DORsm-SSp_ll+SSp_ul_contralesional_END+higherstepsize_log.txt 3.5 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: fa_TC_DORsm-SSp_ll+SSp_ul_contralesional_END+higherstepsize
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ===================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0010
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 61916.896 0.000 1.000 -121354.886 121354.886
  14. merged_timepoint 0.001 0.000 4.218 0.000 0.000 0.001
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ===================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 -0.0056 0.9 -0.0293 0.0181 False
  23. 0 7 0.0125 0.6816 -0.0126 0.0375 False
  24. 0 14 0.0103 0.817 -0.0144 0.0349 False
  25. 0 21 0.0121 0.6921 -0.0125 0.0368 False
  26. 0 28 0.0171 0.3932 -0.0085 0.0427 False
  27. 3 7 0.018 0.2201 -0.005 0.0411 False
  28. 3 14 0.0158 0.3416 -0.0069 0.0385 False
  29. 3 21 0.0177 0.2222 -0.005 0.0404 False
  30. 3 28 0.0227 0.0698 -0.001 0.0464 False
  31. 7 14 -0.0022 0.9 -0.0263 0.0219 False
  32. 7 21 -0.0003 0.9 -0.0244 0.0237 False
  33. 7 28 0.0046 0.9 -0.0204 0.0297 False
  34. 14 21 0.0019 0.9 -0.0218 0.0256 False
  35. 14 28 0.0068 0.9 -0.0178 0.0315 False
  36. 21 28 0.005 0.9 -0.0197 0.0296 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 -0.006 0.9 -0.0289 0.0169 False
  44. 0 7 0.0077 0.9 -0.0135 0.0288 False
  45. 0 14 0.0121 0.5143 -0.0082 0.0324 False
  46. 0 21 0.0223 0.0674 -0.0009 0.0455 False
  47. 0 28 0.0159 0.2987 -0.0061 0.0379 False
  48. 3 7 0.0136 0.5306 -0.0096 0.0368 False
  49. 3 14 0.0181 0.1887 -0.0043 0.0405 False
  50. 3 21 0.0283 0.0175 0.0032 0.0534 True
  51. 3 28 0.0219 0.0954 -0.0021 0.0459 False
  52. 7 14 0.0045 0.9 -0.0162 0.0251 False
  53. 7 21 0.0146 0.4726 -0.0089 0.0382 False
  54. 7 28 0.0083 0.8906 -0.0141 0.0306 False
  55. 14 21 0.0102 0.7637 -0.0126 0.033 False
  56. 14 28 0.0038 0.9 -0.0178 0.0254 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0064 0.9 -0.0307 0.018 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.72175235] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.55407757] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.14897269] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.82759446] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.81498819] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.7166752] No