fa_TC_DORsm-SSp+SSs_ipsilesional_END+CCcut_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: fa_TC_DORsm-SSp+SSs_ipsilesional_END+CCcut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ===================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0012
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 66982.138 0.000 1.000 -131282.578 131282.578
  14. merged_timepoint 0.001 0.000 3.694 0.000 0.000 0.001
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ===================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0055 0.9 -0.019 0.03 False
  23. 0 7 0.0056 0.9 -0.0203 0.0314 False
  24. 0 14 0.0129 0.6694 -0.0126 0.0384 False
  25. 0 21 0.0149 0.5371 -0.0106 0.0404 False
  26. 0 28 0.0159 0.5096 -0.0105 0.0424 False
  27. 3 7 0.0001 0.9 -0.0238 0.0239 False
  28. 3 14 0.0074 0.9 -0.0161 0.0309 False
  29. 3 21 0.0094 0.8389 -0.014 0.0329 False
  30. 3 28 0.0105 0.7996 -0.0141 0.035 False
  31. 7 14 0.0073 0.9 -0.0175 0.0322 False
  32. 7 21 0.0094 0.8814 -0.0155 0.0342 False
  33. 7 28 0.0104 0.841 -0.0155 0.0362 False
  34. 14 21 0.002 0.9 -0.0225 0.0265 False
  35. 14 28 0.0031 0.9 -0.0225 0.0286 False
  36. 21 28 0.001 0.9 -0.0245 0.0265 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0123 0.7514 -0.0148 0.0395 False
  44. 0 7 0.0145 0.5483 -0.0106 0.0396 False
  45. 0 14 0.0226 0.0791 -0.0015 0.0467 False
  46. 0 21 0.0297 0.0266 0.0021 0.0573 True
  47. 0 28 0.024 0.0921 -0.0022 0.0501 False
  48. 3 7 0.0021 0.9 -0.0254 0.0297 False
  49. 3 14 0.0103 0.8642 -0.0164 0.0369 False
  50. 3 21 0.0174 0.54 -0.0125 0.0472 False
  51. 3 28 0.0116 0.8274 -0.0169 0.0402 False
  52. 7 14 0.0081 0.9 -0.0164 0.0327 False
  53. 7 21 0.0152 0.602 -0.0127 0.0432 False
  54. 7 28 0.0095 0.9 -0.0171 0.036 False
  55. 14 21 0.0071 0.9 -0.02 0.0341 False
  56. 14 28 0.0014 0.9 -0.0242 0.027 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0057 0.9 -0.0346 0.0232 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.66743136] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.44582648] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.17324058] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.53947449] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.46564271] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.77036324] No