fa_TC_DORsm-SSp+SSs_contralesional_END+CCcut_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: fa_TC_DORsm-SSp+SSs_contralesional_END+CCcut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. =================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0006
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -----------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -----------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 48722.944 0.000 1.000 -95495.215 95495.215
  14. merged_timepoint 0.001 0.000 4.993 0.000 0.000 0.001
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. =================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 -0.0052 0.9 -0.0239 0.0135 False
  23. 0 7 0.0104 0.6304 -0.0093 0.0301 False
  24. 0 14 0.0072 0.8955 -0.0123 0.0266 False
  25. 0 21 0.0123 0.4516 -0.0071 0.0318 False
  26. 0 28 0.0148 0.2846 -0.0054 0.035 False
  27. 3 7 0.0156 0.136 -0.0025 0.0338 False
  28. 3 14 0.0124 0.3517 -0.0055 0.0302 False
  29. 3 21 0.0176 0.0575 -0.0003 0.0354 False
  30. 3 28 0.02 0.0277 0.0013 0.0387 True
  31. 7 14 -0.0033 0.9 -0.0222 0.0157 False
  32. 7 21 0.0019 0.9 -0.017 0.0209 False
  33. 7 28 0.0044 0.9 -0.0153 0.0241 False
  34. 14 21 0.0052 0.9 -0.0135 0.0239 False
  35. 14 28 0.0077 0.8534 -0.0118 0.0271 False
  36. 21 28 0.0025 0.9 -0.017 0.0219 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0003 0.9 -0.0176 0.0182 False
  44. 0 7 0.0017 0.9 -0.0148 0.0183 False
  45. 0 14 0.0117 0.2835 -0.0042 0.0275 False
  46. 0 21 0.0219 0.0086 0.0037 0.0401 True
  47. 0 28 0.0157 0.0976 -0.0016 0.0329 False
  48. 3 7 0.0014 0.9 -0.0168 0.0196 False
  49. 3 14 0.0114 0.4288 -0.0062 0.0289 False
  50. 3 21 0.0216 0.0225 0.0019 0.0413 True
  51. 3 28 0.0154 0.1769 -0.0034 0.0342 False
  52. 7 14 0.0099 0.4864 -0.0062 0.0261 False
  53. 7 21 0.0202 0.0233 0.0017 0.0386 True
  54. 7 28 0.014 0.2003 -0.0036 0.0315 False
  55. 14 21 0.0102 0.5558 -0.0076 0.0281 False
  56. 14 28 0.004 0.9 -0.0129 0.0209 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0062 0.9 -0.0253 0.0129 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.2366261] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.31413081] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.09353268] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.61530626] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.30119469] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.68785176] No