fa_CST_MOp-int-py_ipsilesional_selfdrawnROA+CCcut_log.txt 3.5 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: fa_CST_MOp-int-py_ipsilesional_selfdrawnROA+CCcut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ===================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0008
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 55738.087 0.000 1.000 -109244.644 109244.644
  14. merged_timepoint 0.000 0.000 2.793 0.005 0.000 0.001
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ===================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0065 0.9 -0.0141 0.0271 False
  23. 0 7 -0.0084 0.8671 -0.0302 0.0134 False
  24. 0 14 -0.0086 0.8438 -0.0301 0.0129 False
  25. 0 21 -0.0016 0.9 -0.0231 0.0199 False
  26. 0 28 0.019 0.1423 -0.0033 0.0413 False
  27. 3 7 -0.0149 0.2739 -0.035 0.0052 False
  28. 3 14 -0.0151 0.2436 -0.0349 0.0047 False
  29. 3 21 -0.0081 0.8286 -0.0278 0.0117 False
  30. 3 28 0.0125 0.5019 -0.0081 0.0332 False
  31. 7 14 -0.0002 0.9 -0.0211 0.0208 False
  32. 7 21 0.0068 0.9 -0.0141 0.0278 False
  33. 7 28 0.0274 0.0049 0.0056 0.0492 True
  34. 14 21 0.007 0.9 -0.0136 0.0277 False
  35. 14 28 0.0276 0.0038 0.0061 0.0491 True
  36. 21 28 0.0206 0.0685 -0.0009 0.0421 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0152 0.2832 -0.0055 0.0359 False
  44. 0 7 0.007 0.8988 -0.0121 0.0261 False
  45. 0 14 0.0144 0.2135 -0.0039 0.0327 False
  46. 0 21 0.0167 0.2011 -0.0043 0.0377 False
  47. 0 28 0.0179 0.1055 -0.002 0.0378 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0082 0.8553 -0.0292 0.0128 False
  49. 3 14 -0.0008 0.9 -0.0211 0.0195 False
  50. 3 21 0.0015 0.9 -0.0212 0.0242 False
  51. 3 28 0.0027 0.9 -0.019 0.0244 False
  52. 7 14 0.0074 0.8436 -0.0112 0.0261 False
  53. 7 21 0.0097 0.7459 -0.0115 0.031 False
  54. 7 28 0.0109 0.6109 -0.0093 0.0311 False
  55. 14 21 0.0023 0.9 -0.0183 0.0229 False
  56. 14 28 0.0035 0.9 -0.016 0.023 False
  57. 21 28 0.0012 0.9 -0.0208 0.0232 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.56669501] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.0169285] Yes
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.09851929] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.4441613] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.11270578] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.51161222] No