fa_CST_MOp-int-py_ipsilesional_CCcut_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: fa_CST_MOp-int-py_ipsilesional_CCcut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ===================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0008
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 55539.194 0.000 1.000 -108854.819 108854.819
  14. merged_timepoint 0.000 0.000 2.791 0.005 0.000 0.001
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ===================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0066 0.9 -0.014 0.0272 False
  23. 0 7 -0.0085 0.8551 -0.0303 0.0132 False
  24. 0 14 -0.0088 0.8251 -0.0302 0.0126 False
  25. 0 21 -0.0016 0.9 -0.023 0.0198 False
  26. 0 28 0.0193 0.1286 -0.0029 0.0415 False
  27. 3 7 -0.0152 0.2529 -0.0352 0.0049 False
  28. 3 14 -0.0154 0.2188 -0.0351 0.0043 False
  29. 3 21 -0.0082 0.8147 -0.0279 0.0115 False
  30. 3 28 0.0127 0.4849 -0.0079 0.0333 False
  31. 7 14 -0.0003 0.9 -0.0212 0.0206 False
  32. 7 21 0.0069 0.9 -0.014 0.0278 False
  33. 7 28 0.0278 0.0039 0.0061 0.0496 True
  34. 14 21 0.0072 0.9 -0.0134 0.0278 False
  35. 14 28 0.0281 0.0028 0.0067 0.0495 True
  36. 21 28 0.0209 0.0601 -0.0005 0.0423 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0155 0.2501 -0.005 0.036 False
  44. 0 7 0.0069 0.8979 -0.012 0.0259 False
  45. 0 14 0.0144 0.2089 -0.0038 0.0325 False
  46. 0 21 0.0171 0.1707 -0.0037 0.0379 False
  47. 0 28 0.0174 0.1168 -0.0023 0.0372 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0086 0.8181 -0.0294 0.0122 False
  49. 3 14 -0.0012 0.9 -0.0213 0.0189 False
  50. 3 21 0.0016 0.9 -0.0209 0.0241 False
  51. 3 28 0.0019 0.9 -0.0196 0.0234 False
  52. 7 14 0.0074 0.8383 -0.0111 0.0259 False
  53. 7 21 0.0102 0.7017 -0.0109 0.0313 False
  54. 7 28 0.0105 0.6357 -0.0095 0.0305 False
  55. 14 21 0.0028 0.9 -0.0176 0.0232 False
  56. 14 28 0.0031 0.9 -0.0163 0.0224 False
  57. 21 28 0.0003 0.9 -0.0215 0.0221 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.56124489] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.01741046] Yes
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.09445709] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.36814452] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.11158166] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.48840569] No