fa_CST_MOp-int-py_ipsilesional_CCasROA_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: fa_CST_MOp-int-py_ipsilesional_CCasROA
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ===================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0008
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 55771.636 0.000 1.000 -109310.399 109310.399
  14. merged_timepoint 0.000 0.000 2.807 0.005 0.000 0.001
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ===================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0067 0.9 -0.0139 0.0273 False
  23. 0 7 -0.0084 0.8629 -0.0302 0.0133 False
  24. 0 14 -0.0088 0.8285 -0.0302 0.0127 False
  25. 0 21 -0.0015 0.9 -0.023 0.0199 False
  26. 0 28 0.0192 0.1335 -0.003 0.0415 False
  27. 3 7 -0.0151 0.2579 -0.0352 0.005 False
  28. 3 14 -0.0154 0.2196 -0.0352 0.0043 False
  29. 3 21 -0.0082 0.8179 -0.0279 0.0115 False
  30. 3 28 0.0126 0.4983 -0.0081 0.0332 False
  31. 7 14 -0.0003 0.9 -0.0212 0.0206 False
  32. 7 21 0.0069 0.9 -0.014 0.0278 False
  33. 7 28 0.0277 0.0043 0.0059 0.0494 True
  34. 14 21 0.0072 0.9 -0.0134 0.0278 False
  35. 14 28 0.028 0.0031 0.0065 0.0494 True
  36. 21 28 0.0207 0.0645 -0.0007 0.0422 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0148 0.3172 -0.006 0.0355 False
  44. 0 7 0.0068 0.9 -0.0123 0.026 False
  45. 0 14 0.0145 0.2133 -0.0039 0.0329 False
  46. 0 21 0.0168 0.1988 -0.0042 0.0379 False
  47. 0 28 0.0177 0.1149 -0.0023 0.0377 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0079 0.8783 -0.029 0.0131 False
  49. 3 14 -0.0003 0.9 -0.0207 0.0201 False
  50. 3 21 0.002 0.9 -0.0208 0.0248 False
  51. 3 28 0.0029 0.9 -0.0189 0.0247 False
  52. 7 14 0.0076 0.828 -0.0111 0.0264 False
  53. 7 21 0.01 0.7293 -0.0114 0.0313 False
  54. 7 28 0.0109 0.6169 -0.0094 0.0312 False
  55. 14 21 0.0023 0.9 -0.0183 0.023 False
  56. 14 28 0.0032 0.9 -0.0163 0.0228 False
  57. 21 28 0.0009 0.9 -0.0212 0.023 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.60090718] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.01508172] Yes
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.09307623] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.42738542] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.10929558] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.53122629] No