fa_CST_MOp-int-py_contralesional_selfdrawnROA+CCcut_log.txt 3.5 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: fa_CST_MOp-int-py_contralesional_selfdrawnROA+CCcut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ===================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0007
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 52590.299 0.000 1.000 -103075.092 103075.092
  14. merged_timepoint 0.000 0.000 2.888 0.004 0.000 0.001
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ===================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.01 0.6861 -0.0102 0.0302 False
  23. 0 7 0.0112 0.6333 -0.0101 0.0325 False
  24. 0 14 0.0014 0.9 -0.0196 0.0224 False
  25. 0 21 0.0104 0.6907 -0.0107 0.0314 False
  26. 0 28 0.0176 0.1878 -0.0042 0.0394 False
  27. 3 7 0.0012 0.9 -0.0184 0.0209 False
  28. 3 14 -0.0086 0.7669 -0.028 0.0107 False
  29. 3 21 0.0003 0.9 -0.019 0.0197 False
  30. 3 28 0.0076 0.8789 -0.0126 0.0278 False
  31. 7 14 -0.0099 0.7094 -0.0304 0.0106 False
  32. 7 21 -0.0009 0.9 -0.0214 0.0196 False
  33. 7 28 0.0064 0.9 -0.0149 0.0277 False
  34. 14 21 0.009 0.7697 -0.0112 0.0292 False
  35. 14 28 0.0163 0.2299 -0.0047 0.0373 False
  36. 21 28 0.0073 0.9 -0.0137 0.0283 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0078 0.8295 -0.0114 0.027 False
  44. 0 7 0.0126 0.3223 -0.0052 0.0303 False
  45. 0 14 0.013 0.2394 -0.004 0.0301 False
  46. 0 21 0.0147 0.2568 -0.0048 0.0342 False
  47. 0 28 0.0179 0.064 -0.0006 0.0364 False
  48. 3 7 0.0048 0.9 -0.0148 0.0243 False
  49. 3 14 0.0052 0.9 -0.0136 0.0241 False
  50. 3 21 0.0069 0.9 -0.0143 0.028 False
  51. 3 28 0.0101 0.6764 -0.0101 0.0303 False
  52. 7 14 0.0005 0.9 -0.0169 0.0178 False
  53. 7 21 0.0021 0.9 -0.0177 0.0219 False
  54. 7 28 0.0053 0.9 -0.0135 0.0241 False
  55. 14 21 0.0016 0.9 -0.0175 0.0208 False
  56. 14 28 0.0049 0.9 -0.0133 0.023 False
  57. 21 28 0.0032 0.9 -0.0172 0.0237 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.51041366] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.2251182] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.77313202] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.79440998] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.90336161] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.7781168] No