fa_CST_MOp-int-py_contralesional_CCcut_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: fa_CST_MOp-int-py_contralesional_CCcut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ===================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0007
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 52216.842 0.000 1.000 -102343.130 102343.130
  14. merged_timepoint 0.000 0.000 2.816 0.005 0.000 0.001
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ===================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0108 0.6092 -0.0092 0.0309 False
  23. 0 7 0.0117 0.5921 -0.0095 0.0328 False
  24. 0 14 0.002 0.9 -0.0188 0.0228 False
  25. 0 21 0.0106 0.661 -0.0102 0.0315 False
  26. 0 28 0.0177 0.177 -0.0039 0.0393 False
  27. 3 7 0.0008 0.9 -0.0187 0.0203 False
  28. 3 14 -0.0088 0.7411 -0.028 0.0103 False
  29. 3 21 -0.0002 0.9 -0.0194 0.0189 False
  30. 3 28 0.0068 0.9 -0.0132 0.0269 False
  31. 7 14 -0.0097 0.7178 -0.03 0.0106 False
  32. 7 21 -0.001 0.9 -0.0213 0.0193 False
  33. 7 28 0.006 0.9 -0.0151 0.0271 False
  34. 14 21 0.0086 0.7909 -0.0114 0.0286 False
  35. 14 28 0.0157 0.2569 -0.0051 0.0365 False
  36. 21 28 0.0071 0.9 -0.0138 0.0279 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.008 0.8099 -0.0111 0.0271 False
  44. 0 7 0.0126 0.3113 -0.005 0.0303 False
  45. 0 14 0.0129 0.2451 -0.0041 0.0299 False
  46. 0 21 0.0139 0.3096 -0.0055 0.0333 False
  47. 0 28 0.0178 0.0644 -0.0006 0.0362 False
  48. 3 7 0.0046 0.9 -0.0148 0.024 False
  49. 3 14 0.0049 0.9 -0.0139 0.0237 False
  50. 3 21 0.0059 0.9 -0.0151 0.0269 False
  51. 3 28 0.0098 0.6961 -0.0103 0.0299 False
  52. 7 14 0.0003 0.9 -0.017 0.0176 False
  53. 7 21 0.0013 0.9 -0.0184 0.021 False
  54. 7 28 0.0052 0.9 -0.0135 0.0239 False
  55. 14 21 0.001 0.9 -0.0181 0.0201 False
  56. 14 28 0.0049 0.9 -0.0131 0.0229 False
  57. 21 28 0.0039 0.9 -0.0165 0.0243 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.4994195] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.23261618] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.82051893] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.84004261] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.93273516] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.83422462] No