fa_CST_MOp-int-py_contralesional_CCasROA_log.txt 3.3 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: fa_CST_MOp-int-py_contralesional_CCasROA
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ===========================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0007
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: 784.0121
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: No
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -----------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -----------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.390 0.002 175.073 0.000 0.385 0.394
  14. merged_timepoint 0.000 0.000 2.968 0.003 0.000 0.001
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ===========================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0107 0.6144 -0.0092 0.0307 False
  23. 0 7 0.0119 0.5695 -0.0091 0.033 False
  24. 0 14 0.003 0.9 -0.0178 0.0237 False
  25. 0 21 0.0105 0.6693 -0.0103 0.0313 False
  26. 0 28 0.0185 0.1377 -0.003 0.04 False
  27. 3 7 0.0012 0.9 -0.0182 0.0206 False
  28. 3 14 -0.0078 0.8316 -0.0269 0.0113 False
  29. 3 21 -0.0003 0.9 -0.0193 0.0188 False
  30. 3 28 0.0078 0.862 -0.0122 0.0277 False
  31. 7 14 -0.0089 0.7746 -0.0292 0.0113 False
  32. 7 21 -0.0014 0.9 -0.0217 0.0188 False
  33. 7 28 0.0066 0.9 -0.0145 0.0276 False
  34. 14 21 0.0075 0.881 -0.0124 0.0275 False
  35. 14 28 0.0155 0.2652 -0.0052 0.0363 False
  36. 21 28 0.008 0.8672 -0.0128 0.0288 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0071 0.8897 -0.012 0.0262 False
  44. 0 7 0.0126 0.3131 -0.005 0.0302 False
  45. 0 14 0.0127 0.2592 -0.0042 0.0297 False
  46. 0 21 0.0143 0.2799 -0.0051 0.0337 False
  47. 0 28 0.018 0.0593 -0.0004 0.0364 False
  48. 3 7 0.0055 0.9 -0.0139 0.0249 False
  49. 3 14 0.0056 0.9 -0.0131 0.0244 False
  50. 3 21 0.0072 0.9 -0.0138 0.0282 False
  51. 3 28 0.0109 0.6039 -0.0092 0.031 False
  52. 7 14 0.0001 0.9 -0.0171 0.0174 False
  53. 7 21 0.0017 0.9 -0.018 0.0213 False
  54. 7 28 0.0054 0.9 -0.0133 0.0241 False
  55. 14 21 0.0016 0.9 -0.0175 0.0206 False
  56. 14 28 0.0053 0.9 -0.0127 0.0233 False
  57. 21 28 0.0037 0.9 -0.0166 0.024 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.50921848] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.24307494] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.67233741] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.88012581] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.97750292] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.94114891] No