fa_CRuT_MOp-RN_ipsilesional_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: fa_CRuT_MOp-RN_ipsilesional
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ===================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0010
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 63074.601 0.000 1.000 -123623.946 123623.946
  14. merged_timepoint 0.000 0.000 2.078 0.038 0.000 0.001
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ===================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0154 0.4128 -0.0081 0.0389 False
  23. 0 7 -0.007 0.9 -0.0318 0.0178 False
  24. 0 14 -0.0041 0.9 -0.0286 0.0203 False
  25. 0 21 0.0015 0.9 -0.023 0.0259 False
  26. 0 28 0.0155 0.4947 -0.0099 0.0409 False
  27. 3 7 -0.0225 0.0571 -0.0453 0.0004 False
  28. 3 14 -0.0196 0.1279 -0.0421 0.0029 False
  29. 3 21 -0.014 0.478 -0.0365 0.0085 False
  30. 3 28 0.0001 0.9 -0.0234 0.0236 False
  31. 7 14 0.0029 0.9 -0.0209 0.0268 False
  32. 7 21 0.0085 0.9 -0.0153 0.0324 False
  33. 7 28 0.0226 0.0978 -0.0022 0.0473 False
  34. 14 21 0.0056 0.9 -0.0179 0.0291 False
  35. 14 28 0.0196 0.1944 -0.0048 0.0441 False
  36. 21 28 0.014 0.5564 -0.0104 0.0385 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0126 0.6155 -0.0109 0.036 False
  44. 0 7 0.0096 0.7697 -0.012 0.0312 False
  45. 0 14 0.0173 0.1588 -0.0034 0.0381 False
  46. 0 21 0.0188 0.2066 -0.005 0.0426 False
  47. 0 28 0.02 0.1135 -0.0025 0.0425 False
  48. 3 7 -0.003 0.9 -0.0267 0.0208 False
  49. 3 14 0.0048 0.9 -0.0182 0.0277 False
  50. 3 21 0.0062 0.9 -0.0195 0.0319 False
  51. 3 28 0.0074 0.9 -0.0172 0.032 False
  52. 7 14 0.0078 0.8953 -0.0134 0.0289 False
  53. 7 21 0.0092 0.8694 -0.0149 0.0333 False
  54. 7 28 0.0104 0.7501 -0.0125 0.0333 False
  55. 14 21 0.0015 0.9 -0.0219 0.0248 False
  56. 14 28 0.0027 0.9 -0.0194 0.0247 False
  57. 21 28 0.0012 0.9 -0.0237 0.0261 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.57553482] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.02866569] Yes
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.12030472] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.81295326] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.06883907] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.69813404] No