fa_CRuT_MOp-RN_contralesional_mirrored_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: fa_CRuT_MOp-RN_contralesional_mirrored
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ===================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0007
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 52047.995 0.000 1.000 -102012.196 102012.196
  14. merged_timepoint 0.000 0.000 2.751 0.006 0.000 0.001
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ===================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0019 0.9 -0.0184 0.0222 False
  23. 0 7 0.0071 0.9 -0.0143 0.0285 False
  24. 0 14 0.0027 0.9 -0.0184 0.0239 False
  25. 0 21 0.0082 0.8657 -0.013 0.0293 False
  26. 0 28 0.0074 0.9 -0.0146 0.0293 False
  27. 3 7 0.0052 0.9 -0.0146 0.025 False
  28. 3 14 0.0009 0.9 -0.0186 0.0203 False
  29. 3 21 0.0063 0.9 -0.0131 0.0257 False
  30. 3 28 0.0055 0.9 -0.0148 0.0258 False
  31. 7 14 -0.0043 0.9 -0.025 0.0163 False
  32. 7 21 0.0011 0.9 -0.0195 0.0217 False
  33. 7 28 0.0003 0.9 -0.0211 0.0217 False
  34. 14 21 0.0054 0.9 -0.0149 0.0257 False
  35. 14 28 0.0046 0.9 -0.0165 0.0258 False
  36. 21 28 -0.0008 0.9 -0.0219 0.0203 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0093 0.676 -0.0093 0.028 False
  44. 0 7 0.0129 0.2672 -0.0044 0.0301 False
  45. 0 14 0.0154 0.0844 -0.0012 0.032 False
  46. 0 21 0.0193 0.0441 0.0003 0.0382 True
  47. 0 28 0.0188 0.0344 0.0008 0.0368 True
  48. 3 7 0.0035 0.9 -0.0154 0.0225 False
  49. 3 14 0.0061 0.9 -0.0123 0.0244 False
  50. 3 21 0.0099 0.703 -0.0106 0.0304 False
  51. 3 28 0.0095 0.7031 -0.0101 0.0291 False
  52. 7 14 0.0026 0.9 -0.0143 0.0194 False
  53. 7 21 0.0064 0.9 -0.0128 0.0256 False
  54. 7 28 0.006 0.9 -0.0123 0.0242 False
  55. 14 21 0.0038 0.9 -0.0148 0.0225 False
  56. 14 28 0.0034 0.9 -0.0142 0.021 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0004 0.9 -0.0203 0.0194 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.53424895] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.25117752] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.36509277] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.25021475] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.68276012] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.58845064] No