fa_CReT_MOp-TRN_contralesional_CCcut_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: fa_CReT_MOp-TRN_contralesional_CCcut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. =================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0007
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -----------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -----------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 50275.672 0.000 1.000 -98538.506 98538.506
  14. merged_timepoint 0.000 0.000 2.673 0.008 0.000 0.001
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. =================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0119 0.4884 -0.0075 0.0313 False
  23. 0 7 0.009 0.7765 -0.0115 0.0295 False
  24. 0 14 0.0017 0.9 -0.0184 0.0219 False
  25. 0 21 0.008 0.8489 -0.0122 0.0282 False
  26. 0 28 0.0137 0.4168 -0.0072 0.0347 False
  27. 3 7 -0.0029 0.9 -0.0218 0.016 False
  28. 3 14 -0.0102 0.5983 -0.0287 0.0084 False
  29. 3 21 -0.0039 0.9 -0.0225 0.0146 False
  30. 3 28 0.0018 0.9 -0.0176 0.0212 False
  31. 7 14 -0.0073 0.8933 -0.027 0.0124 False
  32. 7 21 -0.001 0.9 -0.0207 0.0187 False
  33. 7 28 0.0047 0.9 -0.0158 0.0252 False
  34. 14 21 0.0063 0.9 -0.0131 0.0257 False
  35. 14 28 0.012 0.5242 -0.0082 0.0322 False
  36. 21 28 0.0057 0.9 -0.0145 0.0259 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.005 0.9 -0.0131 0.0231 False
  44. 0 7 0.0104 0.4689 -0.0063 0.0271 False
  45. 0 14 0.0134 0.1559 -0.0026 0.0295 False
  46. 0 21 0.0173 0.0786 -0.0011 0.0356 False
  47. 0 28 0.018 0.0379 0.0006 0.0354 True
  48. 3 7 0.0054 0.9 -0.0129 0.0238 False
  49. 3 14 0.0085 0.715 -0.0093 0.0262 False
  50. 3 21 0.0123 0.4811 -0.0076 0.0321 False
  51. 3 28 0.013 0.3597 -0.006 0.032 False
  52. 7 14 0.003 0.9 -0.0133 0.0194 False
  53. 7 21 0.0068 0.8955 -0.0118 0.0254 False
  54. 7 28 0.0076 0.7925 -0.0101 0.0253 False
  55. 14 21 0.0038 0.9 -0.0142 0.0218 False
  56. 14 28 0.0046 0.9 -0.0125 0.0216 False
  57. 21 28 0.0008 0.9 -0.0185 0.02 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.21087263] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.17142853] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.27841899] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.58394666] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.91856711] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.89396042] No