fa_CC_SSp_ul-SSp_ul_cut_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: fa_CC_SSp_ul-SSp_ul_cut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ===================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0011
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 64833.468 0.000 1.000 -127071.263 127071.263
  14. merged_timepoint 0.001 0.000 6.758 0.000 0.001 0.002
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ===================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 -0.0193 0.1343 -0.0416 0.0031 False
  23. 0 7 0.0111 0.7289 -0.0125 0.0346 False
  24. 0 14 0.0273 0.0112 0.004 0.0506 True
  25. 0 21 0.0255 0.0224 0.0022 0.0488 True
  26. 0 28 0.0223 0.089 -0.0019 0.0464 False
  27. 3 7 0.0303 0.0012 0.0086 0.0521 True
  28. 3 14 0.0466 0.001 0.0252 0.068 True
  29. 3 21 0.0448 0.001 0.0234 0.0662 True
  30. 3 28 0.0415 0.001 0.0192 0.0639 True
  31. 7 14 0.0162 0.3128 -0.0064 0.0389 False
  32. 7 21 0.0144 0.4494 -0.0082 0.0371 False
  33. 7 28 0.0112 0.7195 -0.0124 0.0348 False
  34. 14 21 -0.0018 0.9 -0.0241 0.0205 False
  35. 14 28 -0.005 0.9 -0.0283 0.0182 False
  36. 21 28 -0.0032 0.9 -0.0265 0.02 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 -0.0 0.9 -0.0266 0.0265 False
  44. 0 7 0.0099 0.8326 -0.0146 0.0345 False
  45. 0 14 0.015 0.4449 -0.0085 0.0385 False
  46. 0 21 0.0268 0.052 -0.0001 0.0537 False
  47. 0 28 0.025 0.06 -0.0006 0.0505 False
  48. 3 7 0.0099 0.8917 -0.017 0.0369 False
  49. 3 14 0.015 0.5491 -0.011 0.0411 False
  50. 3 21 0.0268 0.0905 -0.0023 0.056 False
  51. 3 28 0.025 0.1074 -0.0029 0.0529 False
  52. 7 14 0.0051 0.9 -0.0189 0.0291 False
  53. 7 21 0.0169 0.4809 -0.0105 0.0442 False
  54. 7 28 0.015 0.5458 -0.0109 0.041 False
  55. 14 21 0.0118 0.7651 -0.0147 0.0382 False
  56. 14 28 0.0099 0.8453 -0.0151 0.035 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0018 0.9 -0.0301 0.0264 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.0202595] Yes
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.21253937] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.71126288] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.52889352] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.85134169] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.76580554] No