ad_TC_DORsm-SSp_ll+SSp_ul_ipsilesional_ROI+CCcut_log.txt 3.3 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: ad_TC_DORsm-SSp_ll+SSp_ul_ipsilesional_ROI+CCcut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ==========================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0150
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: 236.5775
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. ----------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. ----------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 1.023 0.010 99.953 0.000 1.003 1.043
  14. merged_timepoint 0.002 0.001 2.887 0.004 0.001 0.003
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ==========================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0151 0.9 -0.0557 0.0858 False
  23. 0 7 -0.04 0.6205 -0.1146 0.0347 False
  24. 0 14 0.0495 0.3851 -0.0241 0.1232 False
  25. 0 21 0.0377 0.6585 -0.0359 0.1114 False
  26. 0 28 0.0569 0.2699 -0.0195 0.1333 False
  27. 3 7 -0.055 0.1989 -0.1239 0.0138 False
  28. 3 14 0.0345 0.6641 -0.0333 0.1022 False
  29. 3 21 0.0226 0.9 -0.0451 0.0904 False
  30. 3 28 0.0418 0.5279 -0.0289 0.1126 False
  31. 7 14 0.0895 0.0056 0.0177 0.1613 True
  32. 7 21 0.0777 0.0256 0.0058 0.1495 True
  33. 7 28 0.0969 0.0033 0.0222 0.1715 True
  34. 14 21 -0.0118 0.9 -0.0826 0.0589 False
  35. 14 28 0.0074 0.9 -0.0663 0.081 False
  36. 21 28 0.0192 0.9 -0.0545 0.0929 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0837 0.3098 -0.0331 0.2005 False
  44. 0 7 0.0395 0.8963 -0.0683 0.1474 False
  45. 0 14 0.0782 0.2529 -0.0253 0.1818 False
  46. 0 21 0.0814 0.358 -0.0371 0.1999 False
  47. 0 28 0.0497 0.7713 -0.0627 0.1621 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0441 0.8863 -0.1627 0.0744 False
  49. 3 14 -0.0054 0.9 -0.12 0.1091 False
  50. 3 21 -0.0023 0.9 -0.1306 0.126 False
  51. 3 28 -0.034 0.9 -0.1566 0.0887 False
  52. 7 14 0.0387 0.8956 -0.0668 0.1442 False
  53. 7 21 0.0418 0.9 -0.0783 0.162 False
  54. 7 28 0.0102 0.9 -0.104 0.1244 False
  55. 14 21 0.0031 0.9 -0.1132 0.1195 False
  56. 14 28 -0.0285 0.9 -0.1386 0.0816 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0317 0.9 -0.156 0.0926 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.22899908] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.97083565] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.74142859] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.24302321] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.02879952] Yes
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.04328997] Yes