ad_TC_DORsm-SSp_ll+SSp_ul_ipsilesional_END+higherstepsize__log.txt 3.5 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: ad_TC_DORsm-SSp_ll+SSp_ul_ipsilesional_END+higherstepsize_
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ====================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0120
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 213827.460 0.000 1.000 -419094.120 419094.120
  14. merged_timepoint 0.002 0.001 3.042 0.002 0.001 0.003
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ====================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ====================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ----------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0321 0.6963 -0.0336 0.0978 False
  23. 0 7 -0.0433 0.4707 -0.1126 0.026 False
  24. 0 14 0.0555 0.1844 -0.0129 0.1239 False
  25. 0 21 0.0465 0.371 -0.0218 0.1149 False
  26. 0 28 0.0614 0.1321 -0.0096 0.1323 False
  27. 3 7 -0.0754 0.0106 -0.1393 -0.0115 True
  28. 3 14 0.0234 0.8898 -0.0395 0.0863 False
  29. 3 21 0.0144 0.9 -0.0485 0.0773 False
  30. 3 28 0.0292 0.769 -0.0365 0.0949 False
  31. 7 14 0.0988 0.001 0.0321 0.1655 True
  32. 7 21 0.0898 0.002 0.0232 0.1565 True
  33. 7 28 0.1047 0.001 0.0353 0.174 True
  34. 14 21 -0.009 0.9 -0.0747 0.0567 False
  35. 14 28 0.0059 0.9 -0.0625 0.0742 False
  36. 21 28 0.0148 0.9 -0.0535 0.0832 False
  37. ----------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0788 0.2118 -0.0213 0.1789 False
  44. 0 7 0.0354 0.8687 -0.057 0.1278 False
  45. 0 14 0.0595 0.3862 -0.0292 0.1482 False
  46. 0 21 0.0665 0.4143 -0.0351 0.168 False
  47. 0 28 0.0481 0.677 -0.0482 0.1444 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0434 0.796 -0.1449 0.0582 False
  49. 3 14 -0.0193 0.9 -0.1175 0.0789 False
  50. 3 21 -0.0123 0.9 -0.1222 0.0976 False
  51. 3 28 -0.0307 0.9 -0.1358 0.0744 False
  52. 7 14 0.0241 0.9 -0.0663 0.1145 False
  53. 7 21 0.0311 0.9 -0.0719 0.134 False
  54. 7 28 0.0127 0.9 -0.0852 0.1105 False
  55. 14 21 0.007 0.9 -0.0927 0.1067 False
  56. 14 28 -0.0114 0.9 -0.1058 0.083 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0184 0.9 -0.1249 0.0881 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.5912463] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.46274027] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.76453291] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.11213688] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.00722372] Yes
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.02802865] Yes