ad_TC_DORsm-SSp+SSs_ipsilesional_END+CCcut_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: ad_TC_DORsm-SSp+SSs_ipsilesional_END+CCcut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ===========================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0120
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: 276.5207
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -----------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -----------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 1.004 0.009 109.745 0.000 0.986 1.022
  14. merged_timepoint 0.001 0.001 2.156 0.031 0.000 0.002
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ===========================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ====================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ----------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0312 0.7298 -0.0354 0.0979 False
  23. 0 7 -0.0374 0.6253 -0.1078 0.0329 False
  24. 0 14 0.0444 0.4434 -0.025 0.1138 False
  25. 0 21 0.0258 0.8898 -0.0436 0.0952 False
  26. 0 28 0.0409 0.5653 -0.0311 0.1129 False
  27. 3 7 -0.0687 0.031 -0.1335 -0.0038 True
  28. 3 14 0.0132 0.9 -0.0507 0.077 False
  29. 3 21 -0.0055 0.9 -0.0693 0.0584 False
  30. 3 28 0.0097 0.9 -0.057 0.0763 False
  31. 7 14 0.0818 0.008 0.0142 0.1495 True
  32. 7 21 0.0632 0.0822 -0.0044 0.1309 False
  33. 7 28 0.0783 0.0193 0.008 0.1487 True
  34. 14 21 -0.0186 0.9 -0.0853 0.048 False
  35. 14 28 -0.0035 0.9 -0.0728 0.0659 False
  36. 21 28 0.0151 0.9 -0.0542 0.0845 False
  37. ----------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0772 0.2321 -0.0229 0.1773 False
  44. 0 7 0.0321 0.9 -0.0604 0.1245 False
  45. 0 14 0.0565 0.4467 -0.0323 0.1452 False
  46. 0 21 0.0672 0.4011 -0.0343 0.1688 False
  47. 0 28 0.047 0.6963 -0.0494 0.1433 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0451 0.7676 -0.1467 0.0564 False
  49. 3 14 -0.0207 0.9 -0.1189 0.0775 False
  50. 3 21 -0.01 0.9 -0.1199 0.1 False
  51. 3 28 -0.0302 0.9 -0.1353 0.0749 False
  52. 7 14 0.0244 0.9 -0.066 0.1148 False
  53. 7 21 0.0352 0.9 -0.0678 0.1382 False
  54. 7 28 0.0149 0.9 -0.0829 0.1128 False
  55. 14 21 0.0107 0.9 -0.089 0.1104 False
  56. 14 28 -0.0095 0.9 -0.1039 0.0849 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0203 0.9 -0.1268 0.0863 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.56147043] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.62777197] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.75057615] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.42849949] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.02295153] Yes
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.04512744] Yes