ad_CST_MOp-int-py_ipsilesional_CCcut_log.txt 3.5 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: ad_CST_MOp-int-py_ipsilesional_CCcut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ====================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0089
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 184082.577 0.000 1.000 -360795.221 360795.221
  14. merged_timepoint 0.001 0.001 2.022 0.043 0.000 0.002
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ====================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0114 0.9 -0.0492 0.0721 False
  23. 0 7 -0.0371 0.5485 -0.1011 0.027 False
  24. 0 14 -0.0084 0.9 -0.0716 0.0547 False
  25. 0 21 -0.0069 0.9 -0.0701 0.0562 False
  26. 0 28 0.055 0.1554 -0.0105 0.1206 False
  27. 3 7 -0.0485 0.1747 -0.1075 0.0106 False
  28. 3 14 -0.0199 0.9 -0.078 0.0382 False
  29. 3 21 -0.0184 0.9 -0.0765 0.0397 False
  30. 3 28 0.0436 0.3083 -0.0171 0.1043 False
  31. 7 14 0.0286 0.7369 -0.033 0.0902 False
  32. 7 21 0.0301 0.6967 -0.0315 0.0917 False
  33. 7 28 0.0921 0.001 0.0281 0.1561 True
  34. 14 21 0.0015 0.9 -0.0592 0.0622 False
  35. 14 28 0.0635 0.048 0.0003 0.1266 True
  36. 21 28 0.062 0.0578 -0.0012 0.1251 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.048 0.5269 -0.0333 0.1292 False
  44. 0 7 -0.0004 0.9 -0.0755 0.0747 False
  45. 0 14 0.0375 0.641 -0.0345 0.1096 False
  46. 0 21 0.0424 0.6532 -0.0401 0.1248 False
  47. 0 28 0.0185 0.9 -0.0598 0.0967 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0484 0.533 -0.1308 0.0341 False
  49. 3 14 -0.0104 0.9 -0.0902 0.0693 False
  50. 3 21 -0.0056 0.9 -0.0949 0.0836 False
  51. 3 28 -0.0295 0.9 -0.1149 0.0558 False
  52. 7 14 0.0379 0.6478 -0.0355 0.1113 False
  53. 7 21 0.0428 0.6572 -0.0409 0.1264 False
  54. 7 28 0.0189 0.9 -0.0606 0.0983 False
  55. 14 21 0.0048 0.9 -0.0761 0.0858 False
  56. 14 28 -0.0191 0.9 -0.0957 0.0575 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0239 0.9 -0.1104 0.0626 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.53581929] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.39471737] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.37518936] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.03512949] Yes
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.28611314] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.20139569] No