ad_CST_MOp-int-py_ipsilesional_CCasROA_log.txt 3.3 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: ad_CST_MOp-int-py_ipsilesional_CCasROA
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ===========================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0088
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: 331.2841
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -----------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -----------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 1.084 0.008 137.928 0.000 1.069 1.099
  14. merged_timepoint 0.001 0.001 2.029 0.042 0.000 0.002
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ===========================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0124 0.9 -0.0481 0.0729 False
  23. 0 7 -0.0355 0.5867 -0.0993 0.0284 False
  24. 0 14 -0.0073 0.9 -0.0702 0.0557 False
  25. 0 21 -0.0059 0.9 -0.0688 0.0571 False
  26. 0 28 0.056 0.1394 -0.0094 0.1213 False
  27. 3 7 -0.0479 0.1831 -0.1068 0.011 False
  28. 3 14 -0.0197 0.9 -0.0776 0.0383 False
  29. 3 21 -0.0183 0.9 -0.0762 0.0397 False
  30. 3 28 0.0436 0.3058 -0.0169 0.1041 False
  31. 7 14 0.0282 0.7454 -0.0332 0.0896 False
  32. 7 21 0.0296 0.708 -0.0318 0.091 False
  33. 7 28 0.0915 0.001 0.0276 0.1553 True
  34. 14 21 0.0014 0.9 -0.0591 0.0619 False
  35. 14 28 0.0632 0.0484 0.0003 0.1262 True
  36. 21 28 0.0619 0.0575 -0.0011 0.1248 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0473 0.539 -0.0339 0.1286 False
  44. 0 7 -0.001 0.9 -0.076 0.074 False
  45. 0 14 0.0377 0.6372 -0.0343 0.1097 False
  46. 0 21 0.0405 0.6894 -0.0419 0.1229 False
  47. 0 28 0.0182 0.9 -0.06 0.0964 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0483 0.5334 -0.1307 0.0341 False
  49. 3 14 -0.0097 0.9 -0.0893 0.07 False
  50. 3 21 -0.0068 0.9 -0.096 0.0824 False
  51. 3 28 -0.0292 0.9 -0.1145 0.0561 False
  52. 7 14 0.0387 0.6311 -0.0347 0.112 False
  53. 7 21 0.0415 0.6816 -0.0421 0.1251 False
  54. 7 28 0.0191 0.9 -0.0603 0.0986 False
  55. 14 21 0.0028 0.9 -0.0781 0.0837 False
  56. 14 28 -0.0195 0.9 -0.0961 0.0571 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0224 0.9 -0.1088 0.0641 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.54293578] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.38703027] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.39594953] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.03663886] Yes
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.30758997] No
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.22824717] No