ad_CRuT_MOp-RN_ipsilesional_log.txt 3.3 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: ad_CRuT_MOp-RN_ipsilesional
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ===========================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0104
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: 301.8351
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. -----------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. -----------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 1.049 0.009 113.810 0.000 1.031 1.067
  14. merged_timepoint 0.003 0.001 4.865 0.000 0.002 0.004
  15. Group Var 0.000 0.001
  16. ===========================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 -0.0224 0.9 -0.0873 0.0425 False
  23. 0 7 -0.0531 0.2294 -0.1216 0.0155 False
  24. 0 14 0.0293 0.7888 -0.0383 0.0968 False
  25. 0 21 0.0373 0.5928 -0.0303 0.1049 False
  26. 0 28 0.0771 0.0218 0.007 0.1473 True
  27. 3 7 -0.0307 0.7025 -0.0938 0.0325 False
  28. 3 14 0.0517 0.1643 -0.0105 0.1138 False
  29. 3 21 0.0597 0.068 -0.0025 0.1218 False
  30. 3 28 0.0995 0.001 0.0346 0.1645 True
  31. 7 14 0.0823 0.0054 0.0164 0.1482 True
  32. 7 21 0.0904 0.0015 0.0245 0.1562 True
  33. 7 28 0.1302 0.001 0.0617 0.1987 True
  34. 14 21 0.008 0.9 -0.0569 0.073 False
  35. 14 28 0.0479 0.324 -0.0197 0.1155 False
  36. 21 28 0.0398 0.5304 -0.0277 0.1074 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0405 0.751 -0.0486 0.1296 False
  44. 0 7 0.0072 0.9 -0.0751 0.0895 False
  45. 0 14 0.0534 0.3762 -0.0256 0.1325 False
  46. 0 21 0.0567 0.4642 -0.0338 0.1471 False
  47. 0 28 0.0417 0.698 -0.0441 0.1275 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0333 0.8937 -0.1237 0.0572 False
  49. 3 14 0.0129 0.9 -0.0745 0.1004 False
  50. 3 21 0.0162 0.9 -0.0817 0.1141 False
  51. 3 28 0.0012 0.9 -0.0924 0.0948 False
  52. 7 14 0.0462 0.5535 -0.0343 0.1267 False
  53. 7 21 0.0495 0.611 -0.0423 0.1412 False
  54. 7 28 0.0345 0.8473 -0.0526 0.1217 False
  55. 14 21 0.0033 0.9 -0.0855 0.092 False
  56. 14 28 -0.0117 0.9 -0.0957 0.0724 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0149 0.9 -0.1098 0.0799 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.04189915] Yes
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.65850736] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.77146476] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.11621589] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.00559632] Yes
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.54504263] No