ad_CC_MOp-MOp_dilated_cut_log.txt 3.5 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: ad_CC_MOp-MOp_dilated_cut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ====================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0088
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 182887.871 0.000 1.000 -358453.640 358453.640
  14. merged_timepoint 0.001 0.001 2.183 0.029 0.000 0.002
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ====================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ====================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ----------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 0.0353 0.4518 -0.0203 0.091 False
  23. 0 7 -0.033 0.5774 -0.0917 0.0258 False
  24. 0 14 0.0336 0.5456 -0.0243 0.0915 False
  25. 0 21 0.0468 0.1889 -0.0111 0.1047 False
  26. 0 28 0.0409 0.3717 -0.0192 0.101 False
  27. 3 7 -0.0683 0.0048 -0.1224 -0.0142 True
  28. 3 14 -0.0017 0.9 -0.055 0.0515 False
  29. 3 21 0.0114 0.9 -0.0418 0.0647 False
  30. 3 28 0.0055 0.9 -0.0501 0.0612 False
  31. 7 14 0.0666 0.0107 0.0101 0.123 True
  32. 7 21 0.0797 0.001 0.0233 0.1362 True
  33. 7 28 0.0738 0.005 0.0151 0.1325 True
  34. 14 21 0.0132 0.9 -0.0425 0.0688 False
  35. 14 28 0.0073 0.9 -0.0506 0.0652 False
  36. 21 28 -0.0059 0.9 -0.0638 0.052 False
  37. ----------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.0525 0.5058 -0.0346 0.1395 False
  44. 0 7 0.025 0.9 -0.0554 0.1053 False
  45. 0 14 0.0327 0.8012 -0.0444 0.1099 False
  46. 0 21 0.041 0.7347 -0.0473 0.1293 False
  47. 0 28 0.0265 0.9 -0.0573 0.1103 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0275 0.9 -0.1158 0.0608 False
  49. 3 14 -0.0198 0.9 -0.1052 0.0656 False
  50. 3 21 -0.0115 0.9 -0.1071 0.0841 False
  51. 3 28 -0.026 0.9 -0.1174 0.0654 False
  52. 7 14 0.0078 0.9 -0.0708 0.0864 False
  53. 7 21 0.016 0.9 -0.0735 0.1056 False
  54. 7 28 0.0015 0.9 -0.0836 0.0866 False
  55. 14 21 0.0083 0.9 -0.0784 0.095 False
  56. 14 28 -0.0062 0.9 -0.0883 0.0759 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0145 0.9 -0.1071 0.0781 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.63702768] No
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.82523409] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.79268718] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.2189166] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.0011087] Yes
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.76334283] No