ad_CC_MOp-MOp_cut_log.txt 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
  1. Model Name: ad_CC_MOp-MOp_cut
  2. Mixed Linear Model Regression Results
  3. ====================================================================
  4. Model: MixedLM Dependent Variable: Value
  5. No. Observations: 361 Method: REML
  6. No. Groups: 2 Scale: 0.0098
  7. Min. group size: 156 Log-Likelihood: inf
  8. Max. group size: 205 Converged: Yes
  9. Mean group size: 180.5
  10. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  11. Coef. Std.Err. z P>|z| [0.025 0.975]
  12. --------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Intercept 0.000 193575.274 0.000 1.000 -379400.566 379400.566
  14. merged_timepoint 0.001 0.001 2.573 0.010 0.000 0.002
  15. Group Var 0.000
  16. ====================================================================
  17. Posthoc Analysis for Stroke:
  18. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  19. ===================================================
  20. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  21. ---------------------------------------------------
  22. 0 3 -0.0013 0.9 -0.0643 0.0617 False
  23. 0 7 -0.0333 0.6775 -0.0998 0.0332 False
  24. 0 14 0.0241 0.8967 -0.0415 0.0897 False
  25. 0 21 0.033 0.6719 -0.0325 0.0986 False
  26. 0 28 0.043 0.457 -0.025 0.1111 False
  27. 3 7 -0.0319 0.6441 -0.0932 0.0294 False
  28. 3 14 0.0255 0.807 -0.0349 0.0858 False
  29. 3 21 0.0344 0.5626 -0.0259 0.0947 False
  30. 3 28 0.0444 0.3306 -0.0186 0.1074 False
  31. 7 14 0.0574 0.1066 -0.0066 0.1213 False
  32. 7 21 0.0663 0.0372 0.0024 0.1303 True
  33. 7 28 0.0763 0.0142 0.0098 0.1428 True
  34. 14 21 0.0089 0.9 -0.0541 0.0719 False
  35. 14 28 0.0189 0.9 -0.0466 0.0845 False
  36. 21 28 0.01 0.9 -0.0556 0.0756 False
  37. ---------------------------------------------------
  38. Posthoc Analysis for Sham:
  39. Multiple Comparison of Means - Tukey HSD, FWER=0.05
  40. ===================================================
  41. group1 group2 meandiff p-adj lower upper reject
  42. ---------------------------------------------------
  43. 0 3 0.056 0.4534 -0.0325 0.1444 False
  44. 0 7 0.0255 0.9 -0.0562 0.1072 False
  45. 0 14 0.0385 0.6912 -0.0399 0.1169 False
  46. 0 21 0.045 0.6734 -0.0447 0.1348 False
  47. 0 28 0.0246 0.9 -0.0605 0.1098 False
  48. 3 7 -0.0305 0.9 -0.1202 0.0593 False
  49. 3 14 -0.0175 0.9 -0.1043 0.0693 False
  50. 3 21 -0.011 0.9 -0.1081 0.0862 False
  51. 3 28 -0.0314 0.9 -0.1243 0.0615 False
  52. 7 14 0.013 0.9 -0.0669 0.0928 False
  53. 7 21 0.0195 0.9 -0.0715 0.1105 False
  54. 7 28 -0.0009 0.9 -0.0874 0.0856 False
  55. 14 21 0.0065 0.9 -0.0816 0.0946 False
  56. 14 28 -0.0139 0.9 -0.0973 0.0695 False
  57. 21 28 -0.0204 0.9 -0.1145 0.0737 False
  58. ---------------------------------------------------
  59. Sidak Multiple Comparisons:
  60. Group1 Group2 TimePoint PValue SignificantDifference
  61. Stroke Sham 3 [0.0378204] Yes
  62. Stroke Sham 14 [0.66421351] No
  63. Stroke Sham 21 [0.78907715] No
  64. Stroke Sham 28 [0.25846633] No
  65. Stroke Sham 7 [0.00060319] Yes
  66. Stroke Sham 0 [0.94690315] No