# Meeting outputs

### main decisions

- force19, ok
- continue discussion with other SFB, info dissemination project is our to lead
- Get a meeting with Thomas. We do not care who develop it but we need something going to start testing.
- Continue to work on mice metadata (some files will be sent by matthew soonish)

## strategy

Main objective is information dissemination, the development of the tool should keep this in mind.

- Get MVP with commenting
- Analyse comment to find gaps
- modify tool to push people to fill the gaps (empty box, badges,...)


## software

- need simplified workflow, only one tab ?

## visualisation

- need search filter function
- interaction with author should be straightforward
- maybe need to link to something they already know, as a reminder of what we are talking about.

## My role

- ASAP stop developing, but foster tool use
- social component




#Vorbereitung

## 1. Collaborations

- Thomas wants to clarify goals and work together (why we do OUR software)
- possible interaction with other SFB: contact with sfb1158 in heidelberg (see below: metadata standards)

* proposition *

    - Two software is good: interoperability of what is created is easier to demonstrate, our will not be scalable but will be easier to set up.
    - Need to think about a decentralised system, i.e. look into https://linkedresearch.org community ?
    - Need to work on the smartfigure xml standard: this needs more engagement and an open developemnt, sourcedata should lead that in collaboration with elife/texture people.
    

## 2. Shiny Software

- dropbox version
- server version with ITB server

Visualisation and data upload in a 2 tab browsable software

## 3. Visualisation

- highlighted versus normal entries work
- google-like visualisation has limitations
- NEED visualisation of protocols ?
- long term: browsability of results

** Outside of my area of expertise **

## 4. Standards

- Smartfigure: zip +xml
- metadata: minimal standards:
     - animal (species, genotype, date_of_birth, light modus, diet) - similar to/extended from  pyrat ?
     - experiment (date, time, temperature, light modus)
- https://www.nwb.org/ standard for data (python, matlab export, called hdf5)     
     

## 5. RDM work

- talk with Robert, work with keisuke:
    - data of paper to be organised, pushed to GIN
    - structure worked, file naming comes next.
    - time to perform the work will be reported : paper to follow when 3-4 case studies are there.
    - next steps will be to share the analysis code.
- next will talk with christian for imaging data, using same approach.    


## 6. survey and server

- 14 labs responded
- estimation gots from 5 to 200 TB (whole lab data)
- need to talk to itb people about it.